A fellow Digital Asset Management (DAM) professional asked me whether I believe part of our job was to minimize liability within an organization. I answered yes. In fact, there are plenty of reasons why this is true and why organizations use this (in part) as another justification to acquire, implement and use Digital Asset Management properly.
The general nature of sharing digital assets within the organization (minimizing the cost of reacquiring or recreating assets) along with the permission structure per role/group (self-regulation) which can make digital assets known to many people and accessible only to those who should be able to use them (access control).
Use of Digital Asset Management with Rights Management for each use of a digital asset (yes, more than one use per digital asset can increase ROI) can be part of a business plan.
Minimize the piles of work for general counsel (lawyers) by significantly reducing the amount of:
- copyright infringements (where is the link to these contracts and terms as metadata?)
- usage rights violations (where is the link to these contracts and terms as metadata?)
- property/model release violations (where is the link to these contracts and terms as metadata?)
- over extensions of talent contracts (where are talent contract expiration dates kept and are they linked to the assets they appear in?)
- mergers and acquisition of unusable digital assets which can represent a major loss in value (those assets could have been migrated into a DAM)
- Paperwork (PDF is an ISO standard. PDF with good OCR is your friend. Paper is not a digital asset. PDFs often appear as digital assets in a DAM.)
Simplified discovery and internal disclosure of what assets were created versus acquired for the purposes of rights management (a big liability per use of a licensed digital asset if not cared for properly). See US copyright law and digital millenium act when it comes to laws within the US. There is no international copyright law. Not surprising, laws and regulations can vary per country.
It is also not a secret that large media vendors are making a lot of money pursuing violators once the fees exceed a certain financial threshold before turning on legal action since it can cost fair amount to do this in the first place. Yes, lawsuits are still one of America's favorite indoor sports.
However, many infringements and violations are settled out of court to avoid negative publicity and additional fees. In full disclosure, I am not lawyer nor have I studied law. I do know how to read, though.
Information about digital assets and all of their usage (where, when and how these assets are used by the organization) should be clear and documented with the assets in the DAM. Tracking the assets can help as well. Here is a podcast interview where we touch on these points.
Many of these reasons save green. How much less time is being burned in searching and finding appropriate information in a centralized database with references to the source of the digital asset? What is that amount of time worth to an organization?
What is that time worth when it comes to reducing the time to market for many digital assets in many media formats to be delivered across different marketing and sales channels nationally or even globally? Forget physical delivery of marketing materials which can be outdated or misprinted (another liability which can be managed/corrected through digital delivery… not email) by the time a new product or service is released publicly.
Going the Extra Mile for Legal
As Digital Asset Management professionals, we are regularly in contact with legal entities because clients sometimes require guidance from a SME (like myself) on technical details and contracts which are sometimes written by a vendor to the client's disadvantage.