Attorneys Struggle to Prepare for Legal Discovery
The prominence of eDiscovery in the last few weeks certainly highlights the growing need for all kinds of companies to prepare efficiently and sufficiently for legal discovery.
We first reported that legal costs were rising, because organizations were ill-prepared to manage the massive amounts of content being searched and analyzed.
Now, as it turns out, law firms are also pointing fingers at their unorganized clients -- saying that not only are they unprepared, they don't have any system is place to manage records or track documents.
In their recent study, The Discovery-Ready Enterprise II: Challenges and Opportunities on the Road to Litigation Preparedness, Océ Business Services, a document process management and eDiscovery services company, reports about the key challenges corporate and law firm attorneys are facing in an effort to meet the growing demands of legal discovery.
The results of an online survey of 128 legal professionals highly experienced in legal discovery and records management revealed that:
SPONSORSHIP
CMSWire speaks to a specific
audience of professionals. You can too.
Advertise here.
- 7% of in-house attorneys indicated that their company is well prepared to comply with legal discovery requests involving paper and electronic documents.
- 42% of in-house attorneys surveyed said that their company has not implemented internal eDiscovery processes or technology.
- Almost half of corporate counsel respondents said their company does not have a fully implemented records program.
Yet, there is positive news. Most surveyed agreed that being prepared is important, and that there are steps being made to implement more effective strategies:
- 49% of respondents are in the process of conducting a readiness analysis
- 29% of respondents are in the process of hiring employees with eDiscovery experience or hiring a consultant to help implement eDiscovery processes and technology.
- 63% of corporate attorneys indicated their companies plan to establish internal processes or technology in the next 6 to 12 months.
- 75% of attorneys said that their organization plans to implement a records program within the next year.
Though there seems to be a gap between what companies know they should be doing and what they are currently doing, once a company has gone through search and discovery, it is more likely to take the whole process more seriously.
However, that's little consolation at the time. As we have explored earlier, and as we will continue to explore, there are many different types of companies and products available to help you meet your eDiscovery needs. So don't be shy. Go ahead and get organized.
1 Reader Comment
Leave a Response
More Reading:
- WebEx Comes to iPhone
- Google Starts the Year with Chrome 2.0 Pre-Beta
- Wibe7.tv: YouTube Search Results for Right-Brainers
- Amazon Web Services Launches Management Console
- Social Media Minute 1/9/08
- ZyLAB Tops List of E-Discovery Vendors
- A Recession Strategy for Web Apps
- English isn't the Only Language of the Web
- Opera Mobile Sports New and Improved SDK
- XOOPS Wins 2008 OSSContest Award
From the Job Board (View All Jobs
|
Jobs Feed
| Post a Job)
- Experienced Sales Manager at Ricoh Americas Corporation
- Lead Software Development Eng in Test at Microsoft
- Community Champion / Marketing Manager at Mint Digital
- User Interface Designer & Developer at Congressional Quarterly
- Tech Blogger/Journalist (contract) at CMSWire.com
- Quality Assurance Analyst at Open Text
- Experienced Ruby on Rails / RoR - programmer / codesmith at Deep Salt
- Web Designer at Universal Consulting Services




Free Newsletter:
Email a Friend
Digg It

Marisa: Knowing e-discovery is inevitable, I argue an enterprise can use technology proactively to make its e-records more benign. It can broadcast intent to be lawful and a request that adversaries come forward as early as possible. What do you think? --Ben
http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/05/nix-smoking-gun-e-discovery.html