- What is SharePoint 2010? Vision and Reality
view comments - Knowledge Management in 2012? Probably Dead
view comments - Myths & Realities of Drupal
view comments - iPad 3 vs. New Samsung Tablet: War Starts in February
view comments - 5 Signs Your Company Doesn't Get Social Business
view comments - 5 Critical Steps to SharePoint Information Architecture Planning
view comments - Is There A Business Case For Using SharePoint as an Enterprise CMS?
view comments - Alfresco Enterprise 4: Social, Collaborative, Mobile, Cloud Connected Content Management
view comments
Managing Content Intelligently Using CMIS
I recently talked about “Intelligent” Content Management with a focus on the intelligent management of content, not in making the content itself more intelligent (a completely separate topic).
One of the key principles of this intelligent management is the ability to find and use content in the appropriate context using standards, such as the new Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS).
The ability to simply expose content in any context makes CMIS a powerful tool for Intelligent Content Management. Everyone get your bingo cards ready, I’m going to throw around a lot of marketing terms.
The First Take on Providing Context
Today’s knowledge worker, essentially everyone working for more than minimum wage, has to deal with lots of information. It is thrown at them from all sides.
The only problem is that this information has historically all resided within their own, discrete systems. This isolated information from the information in other, equally discrete, systems is creating silos.
Ten years ago, a solution was proposed — the Portal. It was wonderful and shiny. The pursuit of building the ultimate portal solution led to the establishment of many new ventures and the refocusing of several established vendors.
If you looked at a generic demo back then, you might have seen a portlet not dissimilar from this classic workflow inbox:

From this view, I can tell that several items of content are ready for review so they can be published. If I open the item, I would see some specifics about the content, be able to retrieve and review it, but I would be working with information from a Web CMS or Enterprise CMS. To see more, I would have to open separate systems.
That wasn’t considered a problem, because on that same portal page all of my other systems would be available. I would have a portlet for every system, from CMS to CRM to email to Dilbert. Behind the scenes, nothing changed with the systems. The Portal was just a starting point before jumping into each of those applications individually.
Moving Beyond “Arrange All” and into CMIS
Portals didn’t conquer the world, because the content and data provided were shown without any more connection than they had before. Sure, you had one place that you could search for things, but you had to access each underlying system individually to compile the answer to your question.
Essentially, we went to an “Arrange All” paradigm for viewing applications on one screen. Any meaning derived from having portlets grouped together was created manually. It was great for those that needed to feel in control, but it didn’t help people get work done.
What was missing was context. If I am working on a “case,” I need to stay in the system where I am working without having to jump between systems to retrieve everything. Providing links for convenience is not the same as working with all the data and content in one location.
That is where CMIS comes into play. In an ideal world, all the content would live in one repository and a simple integration could be written to provide direct access to the content. That approach works great until that content is needed in multiple systems. The newer problem is that sometimes the content may live in multiple repositories.
This is becoming disturbingly more and more common. Many organizations bought a repository to store their content years ago and have since bought a new system from a new vendor. It isn’t even a case of age as different groups may have their own repository. Each separate repository works well for managing content, so they have value. There is a difficult choice between managing a large set of integrations and migrating content solutions to one system.
Continue reading this article:
Featured Events View all
| Add event
|
RSS
- Feb 22, 2012 – Intelligent Content Palm Springs 2012
- Feb 26, 2012 – SPTechCon - Sharepoint Conference San Francisco 2012
- Feb 28, 2012 – (Webinar) How to Build Great Mobile Websites
- Mar 6, 2012 – Get Social with Microsoft & Telligent in Dallas
- Mar 8, 2012 – Get Social with Microsoft & Telligent in New York
Who's Hiring? View all
| Post a job
|
RSS
- Web Content Manager in Newport Beach at Orange County Museum of Art
- Principal Business Consultant in Paris at Saba
- Director of Customer Success Management in Nova Scotia at Radian6
- Software Engineer -- Media Solutions in Bucharest at Adobe
- Technical Writer in Charleston at Blackbaud
- Interaction Designer in Maryland at Inmedius
- Project Manager in London at Brandworkz
- Sales Director, Consumer Electronics at Synacor

Receive
the Free CMSWire Newsletter
Email It