CMS News, Reviews and Resources

Content Management Matters ™

Home > Archives > Knowledge Management
 Are you hiring? Target top talent on our CM Job Board.



Turning Knowledge into Power

By Gerry McGovern
Jun 15. 2005
Filed Under:

We are in an era of knowledge abundance. Traditional management theory focuses on knowledge scarcity. We need new management strategies to deal with so much communication and so much knowledge.

They say knowledge is power but, if that were the case, academics would rule the world. Knowledge in itself is not power; rather the application of knowledge is where power lies. They say a little learning is a dangerous thing. Well too much learning can lead to paralysis and a lack of decisive, timely action.

These are wonderful times for people who like new challenges. They are particularly wonderful times for content professionals. Today, organizations are producing vast quantities of content in the form of emails, presentations, reports, and webpages. Better ways to manage this content are badly needed.

SPONSORSHIP

CMSWire speaks to a specific audience of professionals and opinion makers focused on content management, publishing and collaboration.
Advertise here.

There are two basic theories of content management out there. One is summarized by an old saying: "the more the merrier." This theory believes that everything that is said and written is of some value to someone-maybe not now, but at some time in the future. What we need, this theory claims, is better software "filters" that allow us to get to the content we need right now.

Editors and publishers are bad people, according to this theory. They're censors who, until the Web came along, kept back the really valuable stuff, only showing us what they thought we needed. How dare they! Nowadays, we don't need editors, once we have a good search engine.

In this world, the future is about finding diamonds in the dirt. I grew up on a small farm in Ireland and I've done a fair amount of digging in my time. I never found any diamonds, and I've never met anyone who has ever found a diamond while out digging in their garden. Nor do I know of many diamond-mining companies digging in the dirt for Irish diamonds. In fact, it looks like the future of diamonds is synthetic and that they'll be grown in labs--no more dirt.

I happen to be a big fan of editors and publishers, because I believe in the second theory of content management-the "less is more" approach. Editing is not the same as censoring, and publishers do not take away our freedom to choose. All over the world, organizations have become accidental publishers of huge quantities of content. To professionally manage this content, they need professional publishing processes.

The "less is more" approach does not mean less choice or less knowledge. The key question here is: how do we use our knowledge more effectively? If I give you a 2,000-word report when I could have written you a clearer report in 200 words, that's not effective. If you can't find what you're looking for on the intranet, it's not effective. If you need to read so much and take in so much knowledge that the opportunity passes you by, that's not effective.

Time is the diamond in the dirt of the knowledge society. We are constantly trying to find time. Knowledge is only useful if we act on what we know, so we need to balance the time we spend knowing with the time we spend doing.

---
Gerry McGovern, a content management author and consultant, has spoken, written and consulted extensively on writing for the web and web content management issues since 1994.

Was this article useful?

Comments

I agree with you almost completely on the need for filtering. The 80/20 applies to the world wide web. Information junkies like myself do tend to become burdened by our information gluttony. I could never read all the feeds I suscribe to. Editors do serve a purpose. I think it has more to do with cost than editors. It also has to do with the quality of the editor.

However, I think before the invention of the priniting press, few people got published. After the printing press, it became more cost effective.

The printing press fueled the Renaissance because ideas were more easily exchanged. Printed books moved information quicker.

Over the centuries, improvements in technology reduced printing cost even further. It became so effective that daily newspapers and paperback books came into being. The same improvements allowed tabloids, cheesey romance novels and dirty stories to come into being. Last time I checked they all had editors as well.

It is not that there are fewer diamonds in mud. It is that more and more individuals have become more empowered to happen across a diamond field or gain the knowledge to make them in the lab.

The Internet does move information quicker but it is also allowing individuals to inter-connect more. They are much, much more likely to get in touch with those who do "know".

I, for example, discovered your feed by importing Amy Gahran's OPML file. She shared it as do many other knowledgeable people. Amy is a professional writer, speaker, writing coach and very in tune with the happenings on the web. In this respect, she acted as an editor.

I agree "less is more" but the quality of total is why that is true. Less still is more but we now have a much, much bigger less.

Posted by: Lumpy on June 18, 2005 7:56 AM

Add a Comment

Email:
Web Site:
Comments:
Security Code:
  Remember me?
  


Advertise on CMSWire





Add to Technorati Favorites