- SharePoint 2010 - 5 Hot Features to Look Forward To
- Selecting a CMS: How to Build a Short List
- Alterian Drops Immediacy, Morello Web CMS Brands
- Installing SharePoint 2010 on Windows 7
- How SharePoint 2010’s Metadata Services Increase Usability
- Gartner’s Top 5 BPM Predictions for 2010 And Beyond
- Open Text Reports Good Q2, Vignette Contributes to YoY Spike
(Interview) The Background, Foreground and Future of LiveJournal in Russia
CMSWire had a chance to speak with the Russian media company who just acquired LiveJournal from San Francisco-based Six Apart.
Edward Shenderovich is the Director of Strategy for Moscow-based SUP (pronounced "soup" in English). Edward comes from a recent history with Web CMS vendor Quantum Art, and from social networking project Dandelife.
Today he walks through the recent history of the SUP / Six Apart partnership, the future of LiveJournal, and discusses some of the controversy which has been bubbling in the blogosphere ever since SUP first partnered with Six Apart.
Background on SUP and the Deal
CMSWire: On the SUP website, you're listed as the Director of Strategy. You've been around since the beginning. Tell us a little about SUP, its history, and its focus?
Edward Shenderovich: Ok, SUP was founded in 2006. We're a global media company, headquartered in Moscow. We received Russian seed capital. We have global ambitions and our acquisition of LiveJournal seems to be the right step along this way.
CMSWire: Generally speaking it appears that SUP is in the business of acquiring media properties, acquiring delivery capabilities for advertising, and then monetizing these properties. Is that an accurate summary?
ES: We're interested in exploring different opportunities in the social networking space, in the social media space, and in traditional online media (if one can say that). And we want to explore different monetization strategies, through advertising and other means.
This has been demonstrated by our current setup, where the company consists of four different companies right now -- LiveJournal, Championat.ru - the sports news site, +SOL - the media sales house, and Victory S.A. - an interactive media agency.
CMSWire: There's been some speculation that SUP will now pursue an online portal strategy -- like a Yahoo! for the Russian market. Is this in the cards?
ES: No. No. Well, we have no definite plans for doing that. Right now, we're really a media holding company and ultimately these services may be tied together -- for example LiveJournal and Championat have some tie-ins in Russia -- but that is not part of our primary strategy right now.
CMSWire: Announced publicly was SUP's acquisition of LiveJournal. LiveJournal has had quite a successful history in Russia and SUP took over LiveJournal Cyrillic operations via a partnership with Six Apart in late 2006. Can you fill us in a little more on the background of the acquisition deal?
ES: Yes, so we entered a licensing partnership with Six Apart in late 2006, and provided support and marketing for LiveJournal users in Russia and for the Cyrillic segment. So all the Russian speaking users worldwide. During the past year we worked closely with Six Apart and it seemed to be a very successful partnership.
We doubled the number of registered users from around 600,000 to 1.2 mil, and unlike most blogging platforms, most of these users were live (active). The monthly audience of viewers is now about 8.1 mil uniques (Oct 2007), which is about double from 2006 -- we don't have precise numbers from Six Apart from 2006.
CMSWire: So throughout this past year, SUP has been heavily involved in support and marketing activities, but have they actually been running the IT infrastructure operations, or is that something that is just changing now?
ES: We have run the infrastructure operations on the Russian side and we have been delivering a number of services to Russian users, but we were not involved in the infrastructure operations of the hundreds of servers that are running LiveJournal.
LiveJournal's Success in Russia
CMSWire: Switching topics a little, some people say that at least part of the reason for LiveJournal's success in Russia was precisely because it was not a Russian service -- and there people trusted the service with their data a bit more and trusted the service with their "voice" a bit more. Do you think there's any basis to this?
ES: I think that this is not entirely true. The popularity of LiveJournal in Russia was due to several trend setters that started blogging on LiveJournal. These people developed a community around them. The fact that it was a foreign service, um, at the time, it was really the only service, literally the only service available.
There are two stories like this in Russia. LiveJournal is one, ICQ is another. The story with ICQ is very similar. Basically it was started in Russia by the same people. There are about six million registered ICQ users in Russia, which makes it one of the largest active ICQ communities.
So I would attribute the initial success to the conditions at the time -- having the initial group of trend setters on LiveJournal.
CMSWire: So you say that the initial success had little do with LiveJournal's status as a foreign service. What about its continued and current success, did this play a role?
ES: On some level the discussions in LiveJournal are more politically oriented than the discussions in other blogs in Russia. But this is due not because of the fact that its a foreign service, but because it is the intellectual elite who are blogging in LiveJournal. Therefore, the audience is more prone to discussing politics and more interested in the political situation.
I think the fact that the service was a foreign service -- and it continues to be a foreign service, since its a U.S.-based company, from the legal perspective, nothing has changed. All the contracts with the users, the user agreements, are still subject to California jurisdiction. And this is certainly the way we plan on having this in the future.
Why Six Apart Sold
CMSWire: Our readers may know that Six Apart acquired LiveJournal in January 2005 from its founder, Brad Fitzpatrick, and that it was a successful operation in the states as well. Why in your opinion was Six Apart willing to now sell LiveJournal to SUP?
ES: Well, we certainly discussed this in detail with Six Apart. They needed to focus on their core products -- TypePad, Movable Type, and Vox. They are very good at developing and selling those products. LiveJournal, well, honestly it was a bit of a side project for them. And I think there was some frustration on the users' part. And I think it was a perfect time for them -- both financially and strategically -- to focus more on their other core businesses.
The Future of LiveJournal
CMSWire: Let's discuss the future of LiveJournal as part of SUP's portfolio. You've formed LiveJournal, Inc. and according to your FAQ on the acquisition a number of Six Apart employees will become part of that group.
ES: Right,and from a corporate perspective it continues to be the same U.S. corporation as it was before. From a product perspective we've put together a 100-day plan, a FAQ and a commitment to the users. We're focusing on usability, general technical performance, search, and socialization.
Today, its very hard to find people in LiveJournal. There's a lot of functionality that LiveJournal simply does not have. There is a lot of functionality that isn't used and acts as a distraction. So, those are tactical things.
Strategically, LiveJournal's strength is it's communities -- bloggers, but also communities, the congregations of individuals. The individuals that gather based on certain common interests. They help each other solve problems and find information, or create unique projects and products. Creativity contests are an example.
LiveJournal is unique in this way. Creativity is a very important aspect of LiveJournal. LiveJournal, unlike other social networks, is about content. It has a unique place on the Internet, maybe like Wikipedia -- where through collaborative efforts, people create very interesting stuff. And so, we will focus on the communities and we will foster their creativity.
CMSWire: So on a broad strategic level, SUP plans to focus on what you perceive to be LiveJournal's native strengths. And your mission is to remove the blockades and foster their development?
ES: Yep. Definitely. And of course, we want to be the next big thing (laughs). We want to make LiveJournal larger than Facebook. We want to make LiveJournal the number one online destination.
CMSWire: So with an agenda like that, it sounds like you might be competing head-to-head with services like Vox. Is that so?
ES: Um, I think we will be competing with Vox. I think we will be competing with other blogging services. We'll also be competing with MySpace, Facebook, and the like. On one hand, its a dangerous world there, on the other hand, I think we have a very good start.
LiveJournal, Social Responsibility
CMSWire: Ok, so I'm going to switch gears a little and talk about the social side of this deal. There's been what some might call an "outcry" in the blogosphere about a Russian company purchasing LiveJournal. Some fear that the acquisition could result in less free communication in the Russian blogosphere. Do you understand where this is coming from? What is SUP's thought/response on this?
ES: I don't understand where this is coming from. There has been no censorship of LiveJournal users in Russia. There are no issues that resulted in anyone being jailed in Russia, in relation to any LiveJournal political issues.
Censorship is a matter of local jurisdiction. While in the U.S. child pornography is a problem area, in Russia the concern is more about xenophobia. These are the types of content we have to deal with.
For example, there was a court case in Russia where a guy said he was going to buy a gun and go out and kill a militiaman. Following this there was a court proceeding that happened.
There was also an instance where a woman accidentally dropped her child off the fifth floor of a building, and then wrote about it in her LiveJournal. Those are the issues that are a concern to us.
CMSWire: So the issues are more about content coming from the social fringes, rather than from the political minded and politically active?
ES: I think there there are no political court cases related to LiveJournal in Russia. So its not clear to me where truly this is coming from.
There are political activists and politicians in LiveJournal. Political parties use LiveJournal, but, in the same way politicians use WordPress and TypePad in the U.S.
LiveJournal Abuse Teams
CMSWire: In October 2006 when SUP originally partnered with Six Apart, there was an opinion piece published in the IHT by Russian journalist Evgeny Morozov. In his article, he raised some concerns about LiveJournal's "abuse teams" and the potential for censorship. Now of course, all major Internet service providers must have abuse teams or something of that nature. Can you tell us a little about LiveJournal's abuse teams?
ES: Yes. Regarding the abuse team, its a standard LiveJournal abuse team. Its a group of LiveJournal users (not SUP staff, there are no SUP employees on the abuse teams) in every language, who are able to resolve user issues that arise. This is the way LiveJournal has been functioning and there is nothing that we want to change in the function or the role of the abuse teams. There is no need to do this.
CMSWire: And how do users become members of an abuse team?
ES: There's a process that is posted publicly on LiveJournal (see http://www.livejournal.com/abuse/). Any user can apply to become a member of an abuse team, and many do. Generally, they are trusted users who other members of the abuse team know. And initially they were users who were helping Brad Fitzpatrick deal with user issues. LiveJournal support works in a very similar way -- there are groups of volunteers that are making LiveJournal work.
CMSWire: And are abuse teams empowered to remove content from LiveJournal?
ES: They are empowered to ask users to remove content and they are empowered to suspend accounts if the content is not removed. This happens on a regular basis. And most of the time it is at the request of the content rights holder. For example, Getty Images often write letters requesting that content is removed.
CMSWire: Thanks Edward. That's a wrap. We appreciate your time today and we'll see you next week at Le Web 3 in Paris.
ES: Indeed!
Be the First to Comment
From our Job Board View all jobs
|
Jobs RSS feed
| Post a job right now
Featured Events View all events
|
Events RSS feed
| Add your event
- Feb 17, 2010 – Webinar: 4 Essential Strategies for Advancing Your Website's Business Impact
- Feb 26, 2010 – Intelligent Content 2010
- Apr 21, 2010 – Drupalcon San Francisco 2010
- May 5, 2010 – CMS Expo 2010 (Evanston)
- Oct 7, 2010 – HartmanEVENT 2010 - Social Media & Mobile Usability

Get the Newsletter
Email It
Stumble It
Add RSS
Processing...

