CMS News, Reviews and Resources

Content Management Matters ™

Home > Archives > Records Management
 Newsletter:



Iron Mountain Reinvents Itself with Eye on Records Management

By Jason Campbell
Jun 29. 2007

Iron Mountain Logo

Until recently we’ve all thought of Iron Mountain as little more than a backup tape shipping and storage business. While offsite maintenance of tapes is a necessary pain of IT existence (and has been a successful endeavor), recent acquisitions and partnerships have demonstrated that Iron Mountain is headed into quite a new arena. The high dollar records management space would appear to be the company’s new calling and they’ve just put some serious resources behind it.

Iron Mountain’s most recent acquisition is of Accutrac Software whose client-based product, Accutrac XE, performs lifecycle management of records. Iron Mountain will utilize this functionality both internally as well as on-site with their customers. Accutrac XE provides automation tools for indexing and classification, location tracking, discovery, search, query and filtering, retention management, legal holds, query and disposition/destruction reporting.

SPONSORSHIP

CMSWire speaks to a specific audience of professionals and opinion makers focused on content management, publishing and collaboration.
Advertise here.

Iron Mountain’s entry into the records management space is just the latest in a trend of storage vendors boosting their Enterprise CMS apabilities through acquisition. The trend began back in 2003 when EMC acquired Documentum and continued with acquisitions by Computer Associates of MDY Group International and Xiotech of Daticon.

Whereas previously Iron Mountain only dealt with inactive physical records, the addition of Accutrac’s core competencies makes it possible for both active and inactive physical records to be managed. Furthermore, Accutrac’s capabilities extend even further to enable the management of electronic records including email, office documents and images.

If you currently depend on Iron Mountain for physical records management and are concerned about the new direction, you need not worry. Iron Mountain is committed to keeping “business as usual” on the physical records side. However, the ultimate goal is a unified service for the management of both multiple kinds of electronic records and physical records.

Overall, this acquisition puts Iron Mountain in a position to take advantage of a dynamic and emerging market, one where large organizations that face many lawsuits and compliance with multiple industry regulations need a one-size-fits-all solution for records management, email archiving, file archiving and storage management.

Are you currently a customer of Iron Mountain or Accutrac? Are you looking for a records management solution like the one described above? If so, jump down to the bottom of this page and let us know what you think.

Was this article useful?

Comments

Any company serious about records management must manage records throughout their lifecycle whether the records are paper or electronic. In theory, record is a record no matter what form it takes (e-docs vs paper), but executing this practice has not proved so easy. Records Managers are still waiting for an integrated software product that will actually live up to the sales hype and deliver on the promises.

Iron Mountain has been trying to position themselves as a full-service records management vendor for some time now. Unfortunately, their IM Connect web-based product is absolutely horrible as a records management software program. It's obvious that they just tacked some RIM functionality on top of their warehouse carton tracking software and gave the customer access to it. I don't know if the din of complaints got loud enough or whether someone just wised-up, but this is potentially a very good thing for IM and its customers. I say potentially, because it's not yet clear how IM is going to use Accutrac. Will they replace IM Connect with this? Will it be a parallel product, for an additional charge? Will they pick apart the code and try to beef up IM Connect with it? The first scenario would be good, the last, doomed to failure.

As a professional records manager and an IM customer, I hope they don't screw this up.

Posted by: Janice Blackburn on July 2, 2007 9:04 PM

Add a Comment

Email:
Web Site:
Comments:
Security Code:
  Remember me?
  


Advertise on CMSWire





Add to Technorati Favorites

Alltop, all the top stories