Do you remember that old familiar chime “you’ve got mail!”? You couldn’t wait to open the mailbox flag icon on your desktop that signaled a new email message was waiting to be read. Unfortunately the more common feeling today is one of dread and agony.
We open our Inbox and begin sifting through the hundreds of thousands of emails of the day — most of which are irrelevant and unimportant – before we’re able to find and respond to more urgent messages.
When you consider the many new social collaboration and social networking tools now available to help professionals and businesses communicate and collaborate with their peers more efficiently, it’s mind boggling to think many people in the enterprise still get weighed down with the daily confines of email.
Why the Hesitation to Collaborate Socially?
Similar to Shakespeare’s famous quote “to be, or not to be,” many organizational leaders today struggle with the decision to remain in the comforts of communicating with colleagues through familiar email platforms, or to move to more advanced social collaboration platforms that encourage communicating and sharing between teams in real-time. And in this later scene, significant benefits can be received such as increased employee engagement, knowledge sharing and productivity.
There are some common reasons for this hesitation or slow adoption rate of social business tools. For instance, sometimes when organizations’ IT departments push user adoption, they mistakenly place greater emphasis on the tools as opposed to highlighting the improved business process or mission critical work that results from the new tools which can delay the shift.
Many times, group leaders are reluctant to join in without seeing a clear path to value and ROI from the onset. There’s also some interfusing of the terms being used to define the social business space, including social media, social networking and social collaboration, complicating matters even further.
To be clear on this, social media and social networking connects people more on the individual, peer-to-peer level and the exchange is happening outside the organization. Whereas enterprise social collaboration tools are for engaging teams and groups within the organization to encourage collective sharing for solving business problems and for improved business performance.
Also, since email is universal, it remains an easy and convenient platform for teams and individuals to communicate across regions and domains.
To Email, or NOT To Email
Email offers the luxury of being able to send, open and read at any given time. If your goal is to send out a message that doesn’t require an immediate response or input from multiple people, email can be a perfect option. Email also proves to work extremely well when sending confidential or restricted information, or if you want to control the content or broadcast a message to multiple contacts as part of an online marketing campaign.
However when it comes to collaborating with teams on time-sensitive projects, or to gain critical insight from others on documents and business decisions, email has proven time and time again to be a major hindrance to an organization’s productivity.
The obstacles presented by email for group communication and collaboration can be summarized in four points:
- E-mail lacks filter systems — Because email platforms lack adequate filter capabilities, inboxes can easily become clogged with spam and additional unwanted or low-priority information. Email becomes more of an information repository than a mission critical means of communication, significantly slowing down productivity as employees take extra time to weed through junk mail and neglect more pressing matters needing immediate response.
- Inconsistency in the delivery and response due to email trees — While one person in a team may hit “reply all,” others may forget or only copy a few in their response. People who may be critical to a decision could be left out entirely.
- Streams of communication can become interspersed, repeated or even worse, lost in translation — This can cause major delays and inefficiencies in decision making. How can all people involved offer input or value based on previous information and ideas shared if they’re not able to see relevant conversation threads?
- Organizational assets can be withheld – Information exchanged in email tends to be locked in silos — which can become a problem when a key member leaves the company. Valuable knowledge could be lost in personal inboxes instead of shared, accessed and retained corporate wide.
The Value of Enterprise-wide Social Collaboration
Social Collaboration’s true value is recognized when a company wants to have conversations among multiple employees at the same time and get collective, informative feedback instantly, to address burning issues or questions.
- Will BlackBerry Once Again be King of Mobility?
- The SharePoint Information Governance Problem
- 3 Ways Social Media is Changing Online Content
- Adobe: IBM's Silverpop Deal Could Trigger 'Nightmare'
- It's Official: Forrester Says Campaign Marketing Is Dead
- Turn Off the Phones and Leave the Customers Alone
- Why Box's Bad Financials Might Be Right on the Money