A small cottage industry has grown over the years around helping companies become more engaged with their SharePoint platforms. The catch-all term for this practice is “user adoption” and it’s traditionally been important to the enterprise, the user and Microsoft alike.
As of this year, I’d like to stick a fork in it.
It’s dead — or at least it ought to be, and should be sooner than later.
The grinning culprit? Yammer, with a big assist from Office.
This is unequivocally a good thing, too — for the enterprise, the user and Microsoft alike. It’s inevitable, and believe me, people will appreciate it.
Don’t think so? Let me ask you this:
When was the last time you saw a “user adoption” program teaching people how to use email?
SharePoint itself hasn't hit the tipping point of ubiquity that email enjoys, but some of its core services (translation: document collaboration, search, social) have — and the most recent gateway to SharePoint, Yammer, boasts almost immediate usability for most new users. The world doesn't want to talk about “user adoption” anymore.
The world wants to get on with it, already.
What We Mean by “User Adoption”
To accept the idea of “user adoption” for SharePoint, you have to accept the basic premise that SharePoint in itself inherently resists adoption. It’s a simple piece of logic, really:
PREMISE: “User Adoption” services help enterprise users interact with their SharePoint tools.
CONCLUSION: Enterprise users were unable (or unwilling) to interact with their SharePoint tools unaided.
This always presented a bit of a problem for Microsoft. Sure, this belief contributed to a thriving partner ecosystem of training courses, learning materials, communication planning, et cetera, but it also led to some very difficult conversations about the gap between SharePoint licenses sold and SharePoint licenses deployed. Even after SharePoint 2010 largely shrank the deployment gap, the usability and clean user interface were loudly touted improvements of the most recent version.
Why? Because aside from some basic design principles (people in Western culture read left to right, top to bottom) out-of-the-box SharePoint has never been easy to adopt. There’s just too much going on, too many options to choose from, too many ways to get from Point A to Point B.
Solid planning was (and still is) required to impose good information architecture, and Search will always need sound configuration and regular tuning to provide the sort of optimal results that make people happy. Even uploading a document takes a little working out for a first-time user. From these basic scenarios and their close relatives sprang a whole host of quick start cards, lunch-and-learns and the like. I know — I used to deliver them myself!
In spite all of those tools at their disposal, IT owners in many environments have struggled to help SharePoint become the “killer app” that it could be, or perhaps it should be. In the past, they've turned to user adoption plans to help change that. That shouldn't be necessary anymore.
Want User Adoption? Give Users Software They Understand
Earlier this year, I had the privilege of joining a small breakout session at Gartner’s Portals, Content and Collaboration Summit. In the room, a Gartner analyst chaired a roundtable of actual participants in enterprise social networking platforms. One truism repeated by several folks in the room struck me: “For a new tool to be adopted, it only needs to be easier to use than the tool it’s replacing.”
SharePoint hasn't always been that easier tool. Sometimes it has and sometimes it hasn’t. If you’re looking to achieve ubiquity, you’re not going to be happy with a split decision.
In the context of the Gartner room, that idea was mooted about in regard to companies looking to augment their internal communications with social business tools. You can apply it just as easily to the success of the iPad — a multi-tool so easy to use that it replaced a hundred things we never knew needed replacing — and many of the new, consumer-driven “apps” of today.
For many of us, SharePoint was certainly easier to use than some of the things it replaced — file shares, legacy content management applications, the sort of unwieldy dinosaur applications that grew to terabytes of size storing files dating back to the 90s. Yet in our headlong rush to embrace SharePoint, we enthusiastic SharePoint evangelists often missed something — there were plenty of people who liked those old applications.
- Blame the C-Suite for Your Failed SharePoint Project
- Microsoft Leaks Offer a Glimpse of SharePoint 2016
- The Future of SEO is Not SEO
- Everything You Really Need to Know About Docker
- 1.75B Reasons You Should Redesign Your Website
- Discussion Point: Who Has the Best Digital Marketing Hub?
- Why You Should Be Worried (and Angry) About Lenovo