CMS News, Reviews and Resources

Content Management Matters ™

Home > Archives > Web Content
 Newsletter:



Google Chrome: Renewal of the Browser Wars

By James Mowery
Sep 2. 2008

Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari and Opera, watch out — Google is entering the fray with its shiny new creation called Chrome. Google’s newest creation will be available for download today in more than 100 countries for people using Microsoft Windows, but is the amount of drama brewing from Google’s announcement just the beginning of a new browser war? Are we prepared for what Google will bring to the table and what personal information they make take from it as a result?

The timing here is impeccable — Google will be releasing the Chrome Web browser while Microsoft continues testing with Internet Explorer 8. Microsoft has been praising IE8 as one of its best creations thus far and now Google wants to make that a moot point. Not many people — if any — could have seen this move coming.

SPONSORSHIP

CMSWire speaks to a specific audience of professionals and opinion makers focused on content management, publishing and collaboration.
Advertise here.

Could this new browser possibly take over some of the more competitive browsers that have been in business for years — even decades — within a significantly shorter amount of time?

What Makes Chrome Different

Chrome has plenty of competition and this means that there will need to be some sort of incentive to persuade users to switch. Perhaps those people will be impressed by this set of features:

  • Webkit: The same technology that powers the current Safari Web browser and the future Android browser will be utilized by Chrome.
  • V8: No, it is not a car engine nor vegetable juice drink; this is a new JavaScript virtual machine that will allow for better management and efficiency of JavaScript-heavy applications (e.g. Gmail and Netvibes).
  • Omnibox: It is another name for the address bar, but this isn’t your typical address bar. It is capable of detecting site-specific search engines. It will also likely be able to search through a user’s bookmarks with relative ease.
  • Incognito: Since Google snatched up GreenBorder, there were always questions of what Google intended on doing with it. Well, now the answer is clear. “Incognito” mode allows users to surf the Web in a virtual sandbox. In other words, this could significantly help in the fight against malware.
  • Google Gears: Of course Google would include Google Gears by default. This allows users to access content like Gmail and GReader while not being online.

Chrome Screenshot
Google Chrome

Sure there are other interesting features, but these exemplify what we will be seeing that is truly unique with the Chrome browser.

So, Do We Need Another One?

People already have like, what, a few dozen potential solutions in the Web browsing arena? One must question if there is really a necessity to have another.

In a blog post on Google’s official blog, Sundar Pichai, VP of Product Management, and Linus Upson, Engineering Director, believe that there is room for improvement.

“The Web gets better with more options and innovation,” they explained. “Google Chrome is another option, and we hope it contributes to making the Web even better.”

Coming to a Consensus

Much discussion has been going on throughout the blogosphere and news organizations. The general consensus seems to be that one of the following is going to happen:

  • People will take to Chrome well and it will become the world’s most popular browser; people then realize that Google will have too much control over everything.
  • People will like Chrome, but they will still like Firefox better — likely because of the extensions.
  • People will still end up using Internet Explorer because they are not computer literate or they simply like IE.
  • People will be indifferent to the project; it will just serve as a way to try to convince people to move away from Internet Explorer.

All of those scenarios are quite possible, but it is all speculation at this point.

Is Big Brother Watching?

Now, another interesting thing about this is the fact that Google already knows plenty about the users of its products. When a user visits a Website, Google knows about it. When a user views an AdSense advertisement, Google knows about it. When a GMail user receive an e-mail, Google knows about it. If a user is using GReader, well, we get the point, right?

Google knows so much about its users and one must question how much they really know and distribute amongst advertisers. Now, one must now question if they could accept Google knowing even more about the following as well:

  • Browsing habits
  • Every ad clicked on; every add blocked
  • Access to which search engines are being used and what is searched for
  • Knowledge about every video watched and every song listened to
  • How much time is being spent on the Chrome Web browser

It doesn’t end there. The amount of information that Google could collect is endless. The browser is probably the most used tool on the desktop. If Google controls that, they could become unstoppable.

Who knows what loopholes Google could go through to collect information about your personal identity. It is almost engrossing to think about how much Google knows about any particular person who uses their services. Think about what happens when that same person begins to view the Internet through Google’s own browser.

The concern over the fact that Google has a stranglehold on the advertising market is bad enough — it shouldn’t shock people if Google ends up releasing its own operating system to the world. Oh wait, we already have that — it is called Android, and it might be the future operating system of a majority of cell phones.

Now no one is saying that Google actually does these things, but who really knows what information Google collects about any particular person? Who knows what information Google intends to collect from Chrome? This information is invaluable to advertisers.

Perhaps the “Incognito” mode is the only safety users have?

Regardless, there are serious privacy concerns here — it will be very interesting to read the terms of use and license agreements for Chrome.

Interesting Developments Are Brewing

The big question is if and how this will affect Internet Explorer. There is great irony considering the fact that many people still use IE, but those same people have their homepage set on Google. Would Google specifically target IE8 users on their homepage?

Google Chrome could have a huge impact on the browser market immediately, even if the browser wasn’t technically impressive.

Microsoft, as expected, thinks this is isn’t a big deal. Dean Hachamovitch, Internet Explorer’s GM, responded to the news, perhaps over confidently:

“The browser landscape is highly competitive, but people will choose Internet Explorer 8 for the way it puts the services they want right at their fingertips … and, more than any other browsing technology, puts them in control of their personal data online.”

To add more drama to this story, Google has been heavily invested in the Firefox Web browser. The company recently extended an advertising alliance with Firefox up until 2011. Should the Firefox community feel threatened by this? Or is this a move to simply pull people away from IE8?

Then again, will anyone leave Firefox considering the impressive amount of extensions that are available?

To recap: Microsoft is getting slapped in the face, Firefox might be getting a little concerned, Google could take over the browser market, and Google might possibly learn more information about users than ever before with the Chrome browser.

The whole situation is almost surreal — Hollywood can’t compete with this stuff.

Drama and privacy issues aside, Chrome will supposedly be available today. Keep those eyes on Google’s official blog for an announcement. Unfortunately, Mac and Linux users will have to sit on the sidelines for an undisclosed amount of time, but something is better than nothing.

Was this article useful?

Comments

You forgot to mention the obvious fact that this could spell the end of Adsense as we know it, at least from a publishers point of view. Think about it.... How easy would it be Google to incorporate ads directly into the browser. Google ads could then be displayed automtically by the Chrome browser for ANY website, and Google would not have to pay one cent to the Website owner. They still get all the revenue, and don't have to pay out anything to the web owner. Web sites relying on their PPC ads etc should beware, the end is neigh.

Posted by: Leginos on September 3, 2008 5:20 PM

Leginos, that, of course, is assuming that Chrome will be used by a significant amount of people to justify doing that. Also, that assumes that people would actually put up with that. I mean, who in their right mind would use a Google browser with advertisements when you could use Firefox without them?

Also, Google would not make that move because content publishers would simply move to another solution that would take advantage.

Sure, I could imagine seeing advertisements placed directly into a Web browser many many years down the road, but why would anyone put up with it any time soon?

The only way I could see something like this happen is if users were compensated in some way. The most likely scenario, in my opinion, would be significantly cheaper to free internet access — something like Juno (not sure if they are still around, but you might know what I'm talking about).

If anything, content producers need to worry about video and podcasts running away with the show. However, there is always going to be a company out there that wants to promote something.

Posted by: James Mowery on September 3, 2008 5:34 PM

I have no doubt a very significant number of users are going to be using this software very soon.

Google is in a very different league to Mozilla both in terms of funds and marketing ability

As for users putting up with it - of course they will - just look at gmail's success. That's not even remotely going to be an issue.

As for website publishers putting up with it they have no control over what browser/software their visitors use.

Once this software becomes dominant, and it will, then this is precisely what Google will do. Not before then, as they will want to play on the whole 'Google Good, Microsoft Evil' theme. But once it is established as a dominant browser, there will be no going back.

Just looking at where your google ads are displayed at the top of the page here, why on earth would google not merely insert their 'own' ads before the html for your website? There is no copyright issue, and there is absolutely nothing to stop them doing so legally as they have not altered your page in anyway. You have no legal entitlement to claim anything from them if they did.

Posted by: Leginos on September 3, 2008 6:11 PM

"As for users putting up with it - of course they will - just look at gmail's success. That's not even remotely going to be an issue."

That is a very poor example and has no relativity here. See, the problem I have with your comments are that you make Google out to be an unstoppable force that will control the world.

GTalk, Jaiku are lagging behind. Also, Orkut is no Facebook.

NEVER assume anything.

"Once this software becomes dominant, and it will, then this is precisely what Google will do."

Again, you assume too much, and yet offer no proof. They could do this, but it would be silly of them to do so. You must realize that publishers would move elsewhere, and Google would be making a huge mistake by doing such a thing.

Publishers and content is where the value is at.

"Just looking at where your google ads are displayed at the top of the page here, why on earth would google not merely insert their 'own' ads before the html for your website?"

That doesn't mean that people will want to look at them. If Google did that (assuming I was using Google Chrome, which there is no PROOF that I will be), I would simply go back to Mozilla Firefox or Safari. I mean, the argument is over right then and there.

Again, there is a lot of flair in your statements, but there is no substance. Is it possible? Absolutely, but everything you have said is based off of assumptions.

Who would have thought that Apple would actually be hacking away at market share from Microsoft? Microsoft got to complacent, and now they are suffering. Google knows its boundaries, and they would not make such a bad judgment call.

If Google did this, they would have to be compensating the users, and that would likely be in the form of lower costing or free Internet access.

"There is no copyright issue, and there is absolutely nothing to stop them doing so legally as they have not altered your page in anyway. You have no legal entitlement to claim anything from them if they did."

Just because they CAN do it, doesn't mean that they actually WILL do it. It just doesn't make sense.

And I leave you with this question: Do you expect content creators to publish their stuff for free? Where in this plan of yours do the content producers get compensated? Do you think that Google will cut off every other advertiser by just going over their head with a browser? Do you really think that people would put up with that?

In other words, I'm telling you that this isn't going to happen anytime soon. If it did, people would go elsewhere. The blogosphere would go up in arms — every person in the world would think that Google is the scum of the Earth, and all that other wonderful jazz.

Posted by: James Mowery on September 3, 2008 7:04 PM

despite the rumors, i’m finding Chrome’s speed to be inconsistent; it seems to alternate between going lightning fast and then hanging for no apparent reason…despite the rumors, i’m finding Chrome’s speed to be inconsistent; it seems to alternate between going lightning fast and then hanging for no apparent reason…

Posted by: Poker casino on October 3, 2008 8:58 AM

Add a Comment

Email:
Web Site:
Comments:
Security Code:
  Remember me?
  


Advertise on CMSWire





Add to Technorati Favorites

Alltop, all the top stories