- #SXSW: R.I.P Content Management System
(6 comments) - 5 Things to Consider when Integrating your Content Management System and Portal
(6 comments) - Is Microsoft's New Windows Phone 7 Smartphone Competition for iPhone?
- Installing SharePoint 2010 on Windows 7
(5 comments) - April 12 is the New Release Date for Visual Studio 2010
- CMS Review: Oracle Universal Content Management (UCM)
(3 comments) - How Document Management Has Evolved in SharePoint 2010
(3 comments)
The AP and Bloggers Agree to Disagree

It's over. The AP vs. Blogger debacle has been resolved. Sort of.
After having engaged in a “constructive exchange of views this week with a number of interested parties in the blogging community about the relationship between news providers and bloggers” the AP says “resolution of this matter illustrates that the interests of bloggers can be served while still respecting the intellectual property rights of news providers.”
In the interim, the Associated Press has noted that they provided information with Rogers Cadenhead, the technology author who runs Drudge Retort, “aimed at enabling Mr. Cadenhead to bring the contributed content on his site into conformance with the policy he earlier set for his contributors. Both parties consider the matter closed.”
While this smaller incident has been resolved, the bigger conflict between how AP interprets fair use and how thousands of people are sharing news on the web has not. Most everyone agrees that there should be a way for both parties to get along, but about how to go along doing so is the problem. Cadenhead, says that the “AP and other media organizations should focus on how to encourage bloggers to link their stories in the manner they like, rather than hoping their lawyers can rebottle the genie of social news.”
So will the AP continue to draft a set of rules? And if so, will bloggers take it seriously? At the meeting last week, Robert Cox of the Media Bloggers Association, the organization that mediated the infamous gathering, noted that,
if AP was reasonable in their guidance, [Cadenhead] would be willing to consider minor changes that while not perfectly satisfactory to both sides were close enough that both sides could stand down while the posts themselves went back up.
Compromise, while not always ideal, may be the only way out for now. That is, until the AP concedes and admits that it doesn't fully understand the implications of blogging in the world of online news.
3 Reader Comments
Leave a Response
Job Openings View all
| Post a job
|
RSS
- Web Designer at BuzzFeed
- Sales Engineer at Vibes Media
- Sr. Ruby on Rails Developer at ChallengePost
- Internet Marketing Analytic Optimization at eBay
- Web Content Director at Bodybuilding.com
- New Media Manager (Social Media) at Citrix Online
- Web Graphic Artist at Cross Commerce Media
- Copywriter at Laserfiche
Featured Events View all
| Add event
|
RSS
- Apr 21, 2010 – Drupalcon San Francisco 2010
- Apr 22, 2010 – AIIM International Expo 2010
- May 5, 2010 – CMS Expo 2010 (Evanston)
- May 6, 2010 – J Boye Philadelphia 2010
- May 20, 2010 – Gilbane Conference San Francisco

Get the Newsletter
Email It
Stumble It
Add RSS
Processing...


Someone better inform Matt Drudge that Mr. Cadenhead has taken over his site. That should be Drudge Retort.com.
Nothing settled and the AP is still trying to substitute a set of rules about news that is contrary to how it handles others content.
The AP is hypocritical in the purest sense of the word.
This litigious and threatening bevaviour of a the AP cartel is one of the primary reasons that big media is distrusted and why more american's are pushing for media reform.
Thanks for catching it Paul - fixed now