- What is SharePoint 2010? Vision and Reality
view comments - Knowledge Management in 2012? Probably Dead
view comments - Myths & Realities of Drupal
view comments - iPad 3 vs. New Samsung Tablet: War Starts in February
view comments - 5 Signs Your Company Doesn't Get Social Business
view comments - 5 Critical Steps to SharePoint Information Architecture Planning
view comments - Is There A Business Case For Using SharePoint as an Enterprise CMS?
view comments - Alfresco Enterprise 4: Social, Collaborative, Mobile, Cloud Connected Content Management
view comments
Web Content 2008: Companies Do Not Have To Relinquish Control
Day Two of Web Content 2008 started with Jerome Nadel, Chief Experience Officer at Human Factors International, speaking on Making 2.0 Work For You, Inside and Out. Within the first ten minutes, Jerome had already contradicted two points made during yesterday’s sessions.
First, he talked about shifting the focus from user-centric design to success-centric design. Second, with success-centric design in mind, the rule that now content producers have to “relinquish control” is not true – dialog can be structured to illicit the kind of behavior companies want. What that behavior is then depends on how each company defines “success.” And how success is defined goes back to each company’s strategy.
So before even thinking about design, Jerome said, three key activities that must take place are:
- Strategy: Decide on the business model and success criteria
- Assessment: Benchmark where the company stands
- Segmentation: Understand the end users that your company wants to influence
Companies then no longer need to relinquish control because they can in fact build the frame (with the user in mind) to get the desired result. This synchronization of user experience with business objectives can be achieved through engaging, enabling, connecting and building relationships with users.
Jerome’s argument definitely makes sense from a business point of view. I don’t think he’s saying that user-centric design isn’t important, because it is. He repeatedly emphasized the importance of psychology – understanding the way people think in order to attract, engage and empower them. But over and above that, success-centric design is what will drive profits.
A great example of user-centric meeting success-centric is the taxonomy/folksonomy interaction Jerome talked about. He proposed that taxonomy and folksonomy can work together to create a structured social classification. Taxonomists should consider the folksonomy (user-centric) as they rethink their taxonomy, thus improving the structure over time (success-centric).
The main point made here was to not neglect the strategic aspect of usability. Yes user-centric design is important, but that does not mean all control lies with the user. With the proper understanding and framework, user-centric design can also be success-centric.
Featured Events View all
| Add event
|
RSS
- Feb 22, 2012 – Intelligent Content Palm Springs 2012
- Feb 26, 2012 – SPTechCon - Sharepoint Conference San Francisco 2012
- Feb 28, 2012 – (Webinar) How to Build Great Mobile Websites
- Mar 6, 2012 – Get Social with Microsoft & Telligent in Dallas
- Mar 8, 2012 – Get Social with Microsoft & Telligent in New York
Who's Hiring? View all
| Post a job
|
RSS
- Web Content Manager in Newport Beach at Orange County Museum of Art
- Principal Business Consultant in Paris at Saba
- Director of Customer Success Management in Nova Scotia at Radian6
- Software Engineer -- Media Solutions in Bucharest at Adobe
- Technical Writer in Charleston at Blackbaud
- Interaction Designer in Maryland at Inmedius
- Project Manager in London at Brandworkz
- Sales Director, Consumer Electronics at Synacor

Receive
the Free CMSWire Newsletter
Email It