- What is SharePoint 2010? Vision and Reality
view comments - Is There A Business Case For Using SharePoint as an Enterprise CMS?
view comments - iPad 3 vs. New Samsung Tablet: War Starts in February
view comments - Information Architecture - SharePoint's Story
view comments - Wrapping Your Head Around the SharePoint Beast
view comments - SharePoint Implementation the Right Way
view comments - Knowledge Management in 2012? Probably Dead
view comments - 5 Critical Steps to SharePoint Information Architecture Planning
view comments
Things That Go Bump in Your CMS Project
Have you ever asked yourself, “Is it just me, or does everyone have these same problems when implementing a CMS? I have. So I decided to do a little survey to find out. The results were fairly consistent, sometimes surprising, and they give me hope that by combining our collective wisdom we will find better ways to bring rational content management to the world.
The Survey
The survey was pretty simple — one multiple choice question seeded with 15 “CMS Challenges.” Respondents were asked to rank their top 5 and could add their own alternative challenges. They also had the opportunity to submit comments and advice.
There were a total of 33 survey respondents with a breakdown of 58% practitioners, 33% consultant/integrators, and 9% content services providers. I tallied the results in a few different ways — first by looking at which challenges people most often ranked anywhere in their top 5. Next I analyzed which challenges they most often ranked #1. The third breakout was based on role — practitioner, consultant/integrator, and content services provider. The most revealing results were based on the #1 rankings, which I describe here.
The Results
The top 5 challenges (most often ranked #1) were:
- Clarifying business goals
- Gaining and maintaining executive support
- Redesigning/optimizing business processes
- Gaining consensus among stakeholders
- Properly scoping the project
It's gratifying to learn that issues I've run into on CMS projects are not unique. “Properly scoping the project” was actually the most popular answer, showing up in the top 5 most often. But the overall winner was “clarifying business goals.” Of the 33 respondents, 27% ranked it #1.
Take Away: Focus on Business Goals
So why is it so hard to define business goals? I assert that many wayward CMS initiatives are ill-conceived from the start. As one consultant commented, “Make sure you know why you're doing it, then how you plan to reach those goals, and only then plan requirements.” Seems obvious, but, based on the survey results, it's not always done.
There are usually perfectly valid reasons to implement a CMS, but frequently not enough time is taken to develop the business case. Moving forward with unclear goals impacts every aspect of your project from what system you choose to what resources your need. Projects without clear goals inevitably fail to meet expectations.
Take Away: Build Stakeholder Consensus
The other way to interpret the “clarifying business goals” top ranking is that the process of gaining consensus among stakeholders and executives is frustrating and time-consuming. The harsh reality is that content management is not foremost on the minds of most business people. Their own individual business goals (sales, market share, productivity) are top of mind. The challenge is to convince these stakeholders that there is a direct tie between content management and meeting these goals. Now there's a challenge! But therein also lies the reward.
Take Away: Esprit de Corps
To me, the top challenges can be summarized into a single statement: The hardest part is getting a disparate group of people to work together towards a common goal.
Some interesting trends emerged in the comments. Among consultants and integrators, a common theme suggested that client companies tend to shortchange business analysis and requirements gathering. It's human nature to want to get in there, pick a system, and start playing with it right away. But we must fight that urge. Plus, companies try to squeeze the budget and schedule based on assumptions of out-of-the-box functionality. When they actually get to implementing, they find that they've doomed the project to cost and schedule overruns and unmet expectations.
Continue reading this article:
Featured Events View all
| Add event
|
RSS
- Feb 22, 2012 – Intelligent Content Palm Springs 2012
- Feb 26, 2012 – SPTechCon - Sharepoint Conference San Francisco 2012
- Mar 6, 2012 – Get Social with Microsoft & Telligent in Dallas
- Mar 8, 2012 – Get Social with Microsoft & Telligent in New York
- Mar 14, 2012 – Get Social with Microsoft & Telligent in Irvine
Who's Hiring? View all
| Post a job
|
RSS
- Communications and Web Content Manager in New York- at Common Ground
- Business Development Specialist in Boise at Balihoo
- Director of Corporate Marketing in Charleston at Blackbaud
- Business Analyst in Ontario at OpenText
- Solutions Engineer in Long Beach at Laserfiche
- Scrum Master/Agile Project Manager in San Diego at MindTouch
- Copywriter in Tokyo at Twitter
- Senior UX/UI Designer in Massachussetts at Mzinga

Receive
the Free CMSWire Newsletter
Email It