2014-16-July-Runner-Tears.jpgIndustry statistics suggest that the odds of a successful ECM project are dismal at best. Here, some ideas on how to beat the odds.

This past week I met with the General Counsel and CIO of one of those increasingly rare organizations that has absolutely no enterprise content management (ECM) technology, but is now embarking on building an ECM program. This program will not only include rolling out a technology project, but will also include all of the people and process elements required to use the technology to serve the business. Not surprisingly, they want to get it right. They asked me: “How often are these programs successful?”

“Successful? Well, that depends on what you mean by success.” That’s what I started to say. I explained that success is measured differently by different organizations, and that was where the GC stopped me. She wanted the bottom line: What’s the prognosis, doctor?

Based on 20 years of industry data, we can say that nearly 50 percent of all ECM programs fail just from a technology perspective. And of the 50 percent that succeed, half of those fail to really provide value to the business.

The GC wasn’t shaken. This obviously wasn’t her first rodeo. But she wanted to know why so many programs failed and what her team and her partners in IT could do to make sure that they ended up in the 25 percent that successfully implemented systems and provided actual value to the business. As she put it, “Failure is not an option on this project.”

Why do so many ECM programs fail? And what makes the top 25 percent so exceptional?

Why Do 50 Percent of ECM Programs Fail?

ECM programs fail for many of the same reasons that all technology projects fail. But it’s instructive to list out these reasons for failure if we want to avoid them in the future.

The Leadership

We all know that projects need top-down leadership. But in some cases that support is the CEO saying, “We need better information management, so go figure out a strategy.” Then, when the strategy is put together and s/he sees the investment that’s needed to fix the problem, s/he decides to spend the company’s money elsewhere.

Other times, executive leadership doesn’t realize that transforming the information management practices of an organization will take three to five years, and they get fixated on other problems that need to be addressed. So they pull funding or resources from the ECM program.

The Program

ECM is 70 percent program and 30 percent technology. So it’s critical that someone be running the program and that they have a group of stakeholders involved. This can range from as formal a structure as an ECM Center of Excellence (COE), to as informal as an ECM best practices group. But it has to exist at some level. This team also needs to establish a rock-solid communications and training program before ECM functionality gets rolled out, to help ensure end-user acceptance and adoption. And there needs to be a staged approach to the implementation, so that at any point the project can be declared a success.

A big-bang approach ends up in the failure bucket 99 times out of 100. Finally, I would note that some of our most successful information management clients didn't get funding for software, and instead have spent all their time developing good information management habits in their organization. This approach can help bridge the content management gaps until a technology solution can be deployed, while also providing the foundation for that future ECM solution.

The Technology

I just said technology is only 30 percent of the ECM equation, but understand that the wrong product for your organization can stop you dead in your tracks. In the early years of ECM, when the options were wider and the products far less mature, choosing a bad vendor was a big problem. These days, the solutions have pretty much reached functional parity and the vendor landscape has stabilized around a small number of solution providers.