Collaboration requires more than the people on your team. The future of collaboration has moved beyond top-down task assignment and required participation with set deliverables. Instead it increasingly relies upon two key items: the serendipity of finding content and expertise that is just right, right now, and the willingness of people to exchange their time for that expertise.
In short, collaboration is mirroring the shifts taking place in the world of SEO.
SEO used to be about keyword loading, link building and gaining likes by any means possible. With the advent of Google Hummingbird and the Google Semantic Search Graph in 2013, SEO has shifted back to being about the content and experience.
The results are dramatic and organizations who flaunt the new model in favor of old model keyword and link bombing have been severely punished (BMW, JCPenny and recently Rap Genius). In his book,"Google Semantic Search," David Amerland wrote that the new SEO is based on five key factors that are measured, blended and delivered as the most relevant information for you at the time of your search, even if you don’t know exactly what you’re looking for. These are:
These factors provide important guidelines for the future of collaboration as well.
- Trust means the established pattern of appropriate and correct information
- Authority means the earned right to communicate definitively on the topic at hand
- Reputation means the recognition of authority within the social context
- Citation means the explicit connection to information and expertise.
We’ll return to Serendipity in a moment.
The Five Keys to Future Collaboration
None of the first four items can be taken by a person. They cannot be established by fiat or rank or managerial title. They are all given by others.
Even the word "given" is inaccurate — for we exchange a grant of trust and authority for something of value. It might be expedited decision making (in the case of SEO). In the case of organizational collaboration, it is trust exchanged for efficient team leadership and expedited production of deliverables. Authority is granted by the collaborating community in exchange for direction and focus (when dealing with teams) and as a proxy for assumed quality when dealing with inputs and deliverables. Citations are metadata that explicitly connect an implicit recognition of authority and trust with a resource like content or people who produce consistent, quality results.
In the world of human resource management systems and talent management, citations are recommendations and references. Anyone familiar with LinkedIn can see these kinds of citations and recommendations immediately. Over time, reputation is established and acts as a support to (or detractor from) trust and authority. None of these are given by a person or content collection to themselves.
Serendipity means the ability to deliver relevant information or expertise even when it was not directly sought. This is the only systemic, organizational and technological feature of the new SEO and new collaboration. It is the ability to discover inferential linkages to information and expertise that are not direct matches. Elsewhere, I have called this accidental collaboration. The future of collaboration, like the new SEO, relies heavily on the ability to discover and tap into information and expertise that is similar but not the same as what is asked for.
What About Technology?
It should be clear by now that the future of collaboration is less about the technology or the latest "real time" feature. At best, tech can deliver incremental improvements on serendipitous delivery or discovery of content and expertise. But technology companies that focus mainly on the system are missing the bulk of what makes collaboration successful: the willing and excited exchange of information and expertise.
The real question for the future of collaboration is what are you going to offer that others are willing to trade their time, recommendations, insight and added wisdom for?
Once organizations start realizing that they have to move from an authoritarian to a commercial posture where they offer and invite participation rather than mandate and compel it, they will expose the need to have content and expertise that is recognized as valuable to the intended collaboration partners.
- Endangered Species: The Corporate Intranet
- Forget Intranets, Give Me an ESN
- Are These Vendors the Best at Social Media Monitoring?
- Beware Red Herrings: Intranet vs. ESN is a Sham
- Multitasking? You're Killing Yourself for Nothing
- Microsoft's New BI Tool Plays Nice, Even With 3rd Party Vendors
- Discussion Point: Why Would You Buy a Proprietary CMS?