- SharePoint 2010 - 5 Hot Features to Look Forward To
- Selecting a CMS: How to Build a Short List
- Alterian Drops Immediacy, Morello Web CMS Brands
- Installing SharePoint 2010 on Windows 7
- How SharePoint 2010’s Metadata Services Increase Usability
- Gartner’s Top 5 BPM Predictions for 2010 And Beyond
- Open Text Reports Good Q2, Vignette Contributes to YoY Spike
Get the NewsletterMove Over Lotus Notes, SharePoint is Filling Yer Shoes
Have you made that investment in SharePoint 2007 that you've been thinking about for the last year? Or do you already have it and just aren't sure what to do with it? Independent analyst CMS Watch has just released their latest report entitled: The SharePoint Report 2008: A Comprehensive Evaluation of SharePoint in the Enterprise.
Well known for their independent and objective evaluation of content management and associated technologies, CMS Watch provides us with a review of SharePoint that helps us understand where and how it best fits — or doesn't — into the enterprise and how if we aren't careful, SharePoint will become the next Lotus Notes.
Report Overview
The report begins by providing an overview of the SharePoint product, its different versions and the many partners and consulting integrators who work to help you implement it. This should give you a good basic understanding of what the product is all about.
From there, in addition to a detailed technical review of the core product the report evaluates SharePoint's customization and deployment requirements and capabilities. Guaranteed you will customize this product…so read this section carefully.
What's nice about this report is that evaluated on the key business scenarios Microsoft claims SharePoint supports. So you can easily see how SharePoint works in an enterprise and whether it is truly the best solution in a business scenario. The eight key scenarios include:
- Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
- Portal
- Web Content Management (Web CMS)
- Business Intelligence
- Collaboration
- Forms Processing
- Enterprise Search
- Application Development Platform
Finally, there's a section on Do's and Don'ts for both business and technical perspectives.
Report Findings
Probably one of the most interesting findings in the report is that SharePoint is fast becoming the next IBM Lotus Notes — and not in a good way. For years people implemented Lotus Notes databases like crazy, seeing them as the best way to store and share information. Now you hear more about moving all the content and data into SharePoint. But what's the point if you are just going from one messy datastore into another?
“Like Notes in a previous decade, IT often embraces SharePoint as a simple answer to myriad business information problems. But the platform can morph into a technical and operational morass, as repositories proliferate, and IT comes to recognize that various custom applications require highly specialized expertise to keep running properly.”
Other highlights include:
- Prior to SharePoint, collaboration services really weren't that available in content management systems. SharePoint's focus on basic file sharing has addressed the primary needs for most organizations.
- Many customers shared their frustrations on SharePoint's collaboration capabilities. So while they may have led the way, they were and still are lacking in many respects.
- Enterprise implementations beware: “Whether it's the lack of a workflow-based provisioning process, or enterprise-level administration, or the ability to effectively categorize large numbers of documents or PowerPoint slides, SharePoint remains ill-suited to enterprise-wide collaboration and knowledge management,” notes CMS Watch analyst, Alan Pelz-Sharpe.
So is this report negative on SharePoint? CMS Watch has been known to say a number of not so positive things about the platform. However, most of their research is based on customer reviews, so it's difficult to accuse them of being anti-SharePoint.
The reality is that it's a popular platform and is getting more popular every day. But organizations really need to think carefully about how to implement it, just like any other CMS or technology. What Microsoft makes look easy — can quickly become a nightmare in the making.
The 190-page report is available in two versions the CMSWatch website. A team license will run you US$ 1450 for use by up to 12 users. Money well spent we'd say.
Was this article useful?
Email It
Stumble It
Add RSS6 Reader Comments
Leave a Response
Processing...
From our Job Board View all jobs
| 
Jobs RSS feed
| Post a job right now
Featured Events View all events
| Events RSS feed
| Add your event
- Feb 17, 2010 – Webinar: 4 Essential Strategies for Advancing Your Website's Business Impact
- Feb 26, 2010 – Intelligent Content 2010
- Apr 21, 2010 – Drupalcon San Francisco 2010
- May 5, 2010 – CMS Expo 2010 (Evanston)
- Oct 7, 2010 – HartmanEVENT 2010 - Social Media & Mobile Usability
Interesting post. SharePoint is definitely making inroads into what used to be Lotus Notes territory
Thanks for the article. What I really need to know is if SharePoint is an appropriate CMS for an online news magazine.
I love WordPress for its simplicity. But, I'm wondering if it's too basic. We tried Joomla, which was too complicated. I've read about Drupal. Does anybody know what the big boys from Newsweek, Washington Post, NY Times, etc. are using to publish online?
You can't compare Notes and Sharepoint. Two totally different products. It's like comparing motorcycles and humvees.
Lotus Domino is an application platform with email, documents sharing and RAD development. Sharepoint does a few things well and has pre-built functionailty that Notes doesn't have but that's it. Try writing a custom ERP or HR app for sharepoint. Good luck.
What fool develops and ERP or HR app in Notes or Sharepoint… Sharepoint at least doesnt require a overpriced developer to make a form.
Lotus notes hugs… and you don't want to integrate those things!
Lets all stick our development in one giant mess! Brilliant.
Its good for IBM's sales but bad for companies. Everyone is seeing that now.
A bad implementation of Notes is a mess. I've cleaned up more than one, and it is painful. Sharepoint implemented without long term vision is even more of a mess. It's not the technology (although if given the choice I'd pick Lotus hands down), it's the vision that determines the outcome.
As for overpriced Lotus developers, take a look at the position offerings out there and try to tell me that they are overpriced; then look at Sharepoint developers and tell me that they're not overpriced. Get real.
I've been away from Notes for a long time and am currently with a client using Sharepoint. What a disappointment. I am so pissed at Lotus for selling the product for $435 through much of the 90's, when they could have sold it for $99 and gotten massive marketshare. Jim Manzie, Jeff Pappows - you guys were idiots. Anyone remember that piece of shit Notes Express? Thanks Jeff! Good one! I am so pissed at IBM for absolutely failing to market Notes worth a crap.
Sharepoint is pathetic. It's essentially just a folder structure with a few weak steriods, very few. Apparently Microsoft, even with Ray Ozzie, just CAN'T understand the value of creating VIEWS that allow you to look at and manipulate the same objects in different ways.
Please Mr. Ozzie, help Microsoft and MS's customers to understand how powerful views are, how powerful forms are, how powerful field level security is, etc. etc. Since IBM sucks, please build Notes functionality into Sharepoint. Because right now Sharepoint SUCKS!