eDiscovery Drives Legal Costs Up
As it turns out, companies don't usually understand the importance of knowledge and document management, until they are legally required to find and hand over all documents. The process of ediscovery is usually complicated by the fact that companies don't know where their information lives.
Or so says a recent study by the American College of Trial Lawyers and the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System.
Turns out, many companies are still not in the habit of retaining and organizing their documents in a logical structure. In fact, it's so hard to uncover materials related to the legal cases that costs are rising as a result. Out of the 1,400 lawyers surveyed, 87% said that electronic discovery is too costly and driving up the price of litigation.
This is not due to their lack of concern for the nature of the marketplace; it is more from a reactionary model as opposed to a proactive one. In most cases, online documents, emails, policies, procedures don't often live in a well-laid out, easy-to-find format.
SPONSORSHIP
CMSWire speaks to a specific
audience of professionals. You can too.
Advertise here.
Companies are simply not prepared, when it comes to organizing and storing documents.
The study also says that "without a proactive approach to retaining and organizing their electronic documentation, the company has just grown that litigation cost exponentially".
Such a proactive approach involves the following:
- Storage structure: Implement a formal and stringent document control system, so that costs to litigate can be diminished.
- Searchability: Now that information has been organized sufficiently, make it searchable. Often determining your search terms can help with the organization of documents. Create an organized electronic database or a document retention platform with the ability to quickly search for items. Allowing lawyers to perform a detailed search using document criteria, metadata and content simply saves both parties money.
- Retainability: Have a retention policy in place, which immediately executes "save everything". Once a company has been served, it must retain all documents related to the litigation. When considering an electronic document management system, one that meets your retention criteria is the best.
These proactive initiatives will save you money should legal issues arise. They will also keep you and your company organized and up-to-date on policies and procedures. Good knowledge management has a funny way of keeping out of trouble.
2 Reader Comments
Leave a Response
More Reading:
- WebEx Comes to iPhone
- Google Starts the Year with Chrome 2.0 Pre-Beta
- Wibe7.tv: YouTube Search Results for Right-Brainers
- Amazon Web Services Launches Management Console
- Social Media Minute 1/9/08
- ZyLAB Tops List of E-Discovery Vendors
- A Recession Strategy for Web Apps
- English isn't the Only Language of the Web
- Opera Mobile Sports New and Improved SDK
- XOOPS Wins 2008 OSSContest Award
From the Job Board (View All Jobs
|
Jobs Feed
| Post a Job)
- Experienced Sales Manager at Ricoh Americas Corporation
- Lead Software Development Eng in Test at Microsoft
- Community Champion / Marketing Manager at Mint Digital
- User Interface Designer & Developer at Congressional Quarterly
- Tech Blogger/Journalist (contract) at CMSWire.com
- Quality Assurance Analyst at Open Text
- Experienced Ruby on Rails / RoR - programmer / codesmith at Deep Salt
- Web Designer at Universal Consulting Services




Free Newsletter:
Email a Friend
Digg It

Knowing e-discovery is inevitable, I argue an enterprise can use technology proactively to make its e-records more benign. It can broadcast intent to be lawful and a request that adversaries come forward as early as possible. What do you think? --Ben
http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/05/nix-smoking-gun-e-discovery.html
I work at a law firm that is one of the largest eDiscovery users in the US. Our litigation database for the client discovery documents is well maintained. Our own servers are a complete mess and our data retention policies vary from server to server.