Editorial
Research Report
Building the Case for Modern Public Sector Messaging
The Gist
- Why did a marketing veteran's LinkedIn post go unchallenged? Colleagues recognized the ad was tone-deaf but stayed silent, showing how personal authority can suppress honest feedback.
- Why isn't marketing a fact-based discipline? Performance data reveals outcomes like clicks and conversions, but it can't explain why an audience felt connected or alienated.
- What actually separates skilled marketers from the rest? Top marketers treat their own reactions as a starting hypothesis, not a final verdict, and stay open to being proven wrong by data.
I once worked for someone who was absolutely certain they had marketing figured out.
They had opinions about everything. The colors. The copy. The campaign concepts. Every idea that came through the door got measured against their personal taste, and their personal taste was the final word. I learned quickly that my job was not to bring strategy. It was to bring options and wait to see which one matched what they already believed.
Years passed. They retired. And recently, something interesting happened.
The LinkedIn Post That Said It All
They posted on LinkedIn. It was a piece of marketing they called the best they had ever seen. It was, to put it plainly, offensive. I will not describe it in detail because that is not the point. The point is that they were not embarrassed. They were proud. And in the comments, people were polite. Nobody pushed back. Nobody said what they were thinking. They just left a few careful words that said nothing at all and kept scrolling.
That moment stopped me cold.
Because I know that plenty of people saw that post and thought exactly what I thought. They just did not say it. And that tension, that gap between what one person sees as genius and what everyone else quietly sees as a disaster, is not a glitch in marketing. It is the entire game.
Related Article: The Best Marketers Right Now Aren't Better Prompters
Marketing Is a Feeling, Not a Fact
Here is what I want every marketer, every brand leader and every business owner to understand: marketing is not a fact. It is a feeling. And feelings are personal.
Think about the last time you were sitting on your couch watching television and an ad came on that made you shake your head. You sat there thinking, someone actually paid to have that made. Someone in a conference room looked at that and said yes. Someone signed a check. And that ad ran.
How does that happen?
It happens because the person who approved it felt something different than you did. Maybe they saw themselves in it. Maybe it reminded them of something that made them feel safe or smart or validated. Maybe they just liked the music. Whatever the reason, their emotional response told them it was good. And in marketing, emotion drives decisions more often than we want to admit.
I have spent over 20 years in this industry. I have sat in rooms with engineers who built brilliant products and could not understand why customers were not buying. I have worked with founders who were so close to what they created that they could not see what a stranger would see when they looked at it for the first time. And I have watched campaigns get approved because the CEO's spouse liked the tagline.
Marketing is deeply, uncomfortably human. And humans are not consistent.
The Math Measures Outcomes, Not Causes
I also say that marketing is math, and I mean it. There is real data here. There are open rates and click-throughs and cost per acquisition and conversion rates. Numbers do not lie. But here is what the numbers cannot tell you: why someone felt something. The math measures the outcome. It does not tell you what caused the spark or what killed it.
That is where the art lives. And that is where so many well-meaning, intelligent people get into trouble.
They confuse their taste with the market's response. They look at a campaign and judge it by whether they personally like it rather than whether it will resonate with the specific human being they are trying to reach. And those two things are not the same.
Certainty Is the Real Risk, Not Inexperience
The person I mentioned was not stupid. They were experienced. They had seen a lot of marketing over a long career. But experience does not automatically translate to understanding what will connect with a customer who is nothing like you. If anything, years of success can make people more confident in a personal lens that has quietly drifted out of alignment with the audience.
That is the real danger. Not ignorance. Certainty.
The best marketers I know carry a kind of productive doubt with them at all times. They make a recommendation, defend it with data and reasoning, and then stay genuinely open to being wrong. They test. They watch what the numbers say. They adjust. And they never, ever confuse what they feel with what the market will feel.
That LinkedIn post was not a failure of taste. It was a failure of perspective. They were no longer thinking about the audience. They were thinking about themselves.
And that is the thing about marketing that nobody tells you when you are starting out. The moment it becomes about you, you have already lost.
Key Lessons From When Marketing Taste Overrides the Audience
Editor's note: The following table highlights the most important lessons, actions and strategic considerations emerging from this essay on why personal certainty is marketing's biggest blind spot.
| Key Area | What Happened | Why It Matters | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal taste vs. audience response | A veteran marketer publicly praised an ad colleagues privately found offensive | Long experience can calcify into a lens that no longer reflects the actual audience | Pressure-test personal reactions against real audience feedback before approving creative |
| Data's limits | The essay notes metrics like open rates and conversions measure outcomes, not causes | Teams can mistake performance data for proof of "why," missing the emotional driver behind results | Pair quantitative results with qualitative research, such as interviews or sentiment analysis, to explain the "why" |
| Groupthink and silence | Colleagues left vague, noncommittal comments rather than voicing disagreement | Unchallenged authority suppresses the honest feedback that catches misaligned creative before it ships | Build review processes that reward dissent, not just polite consensus |
| Confidence vs. certainty | The essay distinguishes marketers who test and adjust from those who stop questioning themselves | Certainty, not inexperience, is framed as the primary risk factor for tone-deaf marketing | Treat every creative decision as a hypothesis to validate, not a verdict to defend |
Why Some Dealers Are Pulling Ahead With AI
Register
Content Leaders Collective: Proving Content's Business Impact Starts With the Right CCMS
Register
Replacing Tasks, Not Roles: The Changing Nature of Contact Center Work
Register
How Fast-Moving Content Teams Keep Up as Sites Grow
Register
Why Connection Is the Whole Job
Your customer does not care that you love the logo. They do not care that the headline took three weeks to write. They do not care about any of the work that went into it. They care about one thing: whether what you are showing them makes them feel something worth acting on.
Connection is the whole job. And connection is unpredictable, personal and stubbornly human.
That is why everyone thinks they are a marketing expert. Because everyone has feelings. What separates the experts from the noise is understanding that your feelings are only the beginning of the research, not the end of it.
Learn how you can join our contributor community.