Editorial
The Gist
-
Shift to brand authenticity. Consumers are moving from ideology-driven brands to authentic ones and prioritizing real values over polished brand personas.
-
Influencer trust erodes. Overuse of influencers has diluted trust, as consumers increasingly seek genuine connections over paid endorsements.
-
Power of transparency. Brands embracing transparency and consumer-centered values are gaining loyalty, while those relying on lifestyle messaging risk losing relevance.
When Steve Jobs launched his campaign for Apple after his triumphant return in 1997, the campaign stood out for its lack of emphasis on the technical superiority of the products. It instead focused on the ideals these products symbolized — and more importantly, the "Apple Brand.” Jobs famously stated, “We’re here to put a dent in the universe. Otherwise, why else even be here?”
This wasn’t a pitch for better hardware or software: It was a strident call to join a movement.
Not that this was anything new; after all, many of us still remember the 1984 TV commercial, an ad based on George Orwell's dystopian novel “1984,” presenting Apple as a force of freedom and rebellion against conformity and control. Even so, Apple's late-90s campaign marked a turning point, shifting from product-centric marketing to ideology-centric branding, where the product became a means to achieve a broader, almost transcendent, purpose.
Tapping into that same Zeitgeist — that of the Triumphant 90s for the United States, flush and fresh from the collapse of the Soviet Union —- Nike’s brand marketing evolved as well. It moved beyond promoting the physical attributes of its shoes to embodying an ideology of achievement and ultimate victory after a long struggle. The “Just Do It” campaign did not talk about the shoe itself. Instead, it talked about the individual’s potential and the spirit of striving for greatness.
How Brands Evolved from Products to Symbols of Identity
Academic marketing expert Douglas Holt notes that brands like Nike and Apple have become iconic not because of their products but because "they managed to insert themselves into cultural conversations about identity, achievement and self-expression.” This shift has had a lasting and enduring impact on how consumers relate to brands.
In earlier times, product pitches were more or less straightforward. They were advertised for what they were (Sanka anyone?), with experts backing their quality or efficacy (Who was that one doctor in 10 who always dissented, anyway?). The focus was on why the consumer needed the product and what it could do for them.
But as the ideology-centric approach took hold, products were no longer just objects of consumption; they became badges of identity. A brand was no longer just a name or a logo. It became an invitation to join a community or a movement (Docker Pants anyone?).
Naomi Klein, in her book “No Logo,” argues that brands have created a “tribal” sense of belonging. “What branding aims to do is to project an image of a company as a source of meaning and community, not just a seller of goods,” she wrote.
This tribalism is evident in how consumers align themselves with brands as part of their identity. To build that connection, brands must maintain brand authenticity, where consumers believe they’re engaging with a company that genuinely reflects its promises and values. Wearing Nike shoes or using Apple products means more than just utilizing high-quality items; it signals that one subscribes to the ideology these brands promote. This is a powerful psychological tactic, creating an emotional bond that goes beyond rational product evaluation.
Related Article: What Brand Perception Is and Why It Matters
Why Anti-Brand Sentiment Drives Demand for Authenticity
Despite the dominance of branding strategies that emphasize identity and belonging, there is a growing counter-culture rejecting this form of consumer manipulation.
Critics argue that branding has shifted from persuasion based on rational facts and demonstrable product quality to manipulation based on social and emotional factors — potentially eroding independent critical thinking, healthy skepticism and individual decision-making.
Professor Mark Ritson of Melbourne Business School said, “There’s an increasing disconnect between influencers and consumers, who are beginning to see through the facade and realize that influencers are just another marketing channel.”
Companies need to cultivate brand authenticity — projecting not just an image, but also aligning their values and promises with the expectations of their audience.
This rise of anti-brand sentiment also has its ideological context. Indeed, it is tied to the broader skepticism of expertise and authority figures. In the digital age, information is democratized — notwithstanding the forces that are cracking down on anything that bucks the established constellation of views and perspectives — and consumers are increasingly wary of the neatly polished narratives presented by brands and influencers. They seek brand authenticity and transparency. As Ritson notes, "The overuse of influencers by brands has diluted the very value they were supposed to bring — authenticity and trust. Now, many are simply seen as paid endorsers.”
The anti-brand movement highlights this shift toward brand authenticity and individuality in consumer culture. Companies that adapt by demonstrating transparency, humility and a genuine connection to consumer values will likely succeed. In this new paradigm, consumers are more likely to engage with companies that genuinely deliver what they promise, not merely those that signal a certain lifestyle.
This cultural shift is also reflected in the decline of celebrity influence. It is clear that consumers are growing skeptical of influencers whose endorsements come across as forced, inauthentic and financially motivated. We have to look no further than Joe Rogan and the discontent among his still large audience, as his rise to mainstream fame now risks undermining his image as an anti-establishment voice.
An unmistakable shift appears to be taking place towards “micro-influencers” and grassroots campaigns. This is perhaps an indication that people are more willing to trust voices that ring true and align with their own reality, rather than those coming from the elite.
Related Article: Is Your Brand Voice Resonating with Customers?
Webinar
Sep
25
CMS Briefing: A Live Look at What’s Next in AI-Driven Platforms
Learn how leading organizations are using AI‑driven tools to publish faster, personalize smarter and stay secure.
Register
Webinar
Sep
25
Call Spoofing Trends Financial Institutions Can't Afford to Ignore
Don't let robocalls sabotage your customer relationships. Learn how to secure your voice channel.
Register
Webinar
On demand
Ready or Not: How Data-First Organizations Are Unlocking Agentforce Potential
Learn how to cut through the noise, activate Agentforce and build a Salesforce AI strategy that actually delivers.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
CX Reality Check: What Your Customers Are Really Thinking
Register now and get the insights you need to not just meet rising expectations, but exceed them.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
Content Leaders Collective: What a Good CCMS Actually Looks Like
Discover how content leaders transform clunky systems into growth engines — and why your competitors are ahead.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
From Hype to High-Impact CX Strategies That Actually Scale
Turn buzzworthy AI and outsourcing trends into measurable CX wins with fresh 2025 data.
Watch Now
The Future of Brand Authenticity in a Skeptical Market
The evolution of branding from product-centric to ideology-centric marketing has profoundly influenced consumer culture. While brands like Apple and Nike initially thrived by attaching themselves to larger narratives of freedom, creativity and achievement, a growing number of consumers are now pushing back. The anti-brand and anti-influencer movements demonstrate a desire for brand authenticity and individuality in a market saturated with manipulative branding techniques.
As this trend continues, it challenges companies to rethink how they engage with their audience. Successful companies of the future will likely be those that prioritize authenticity, transparency and a genuine connection to consumer values over polished, larger-than-life personas. This marks a return to a more individualistic approach, where consumers make choices based on the product's true value rather than the ideology it claims to embody.
Learn how you can join our contributor community.
