Editorial
The Gist
- Awareness isn’t strategy — it’s theater. For more than a century, marketers have treated awareness as a goal rather than a byproduct, rewarding visibility instead of value.
- Recognition doesn’t equal readiness. Linear models like AIDA collapse under data scrutiny, proving that conversion follows activation, not exposure.
- Activation is the new foundation. Frameworks built on measurable behavior — acquisition, activation, retention, revenue and referral — replace awareness with evidence, accountability, and growth.
There are only a handful of words I never use, not in life or business. “Expectations.” “Assumptions.” And the mother of them all …“awareness.”
I will spare you the details behind the first two in this article and instead, focus on the one that continues to drain budgets, dilute strategy and refuse to die.
Awareness.
As my hero, Gerry Tabio, always says, “if you want awareness, light a building on fire. You’ll be astonished how quickly people become aware of you.”
Marketers treat awareness as the universal starting line, yet it remains the most expensive metric with the least connection to measurable performance.
I remember the first time I heard someone say, “We just need to build awareness.” The room nodded as if someone had uncovered a hidden truth. But awareness is not the beginning of marketing. It is what happens after marketing works.
Awareness metrics may show who saw an ad and even who acted, but they rarely show whether the spend was worth it. The connection between exposure and outcome exists, but the cost of that connection is almost never examined.
The argument against awareness is not philosophical; it is financial. Measurable actions (acquisition, activation, retention, and revenue) consistently produce exponential gains, while awareness spend compounds waste. The discipline gap is now the defining risk for marketing leaders.
So yes, I hate the word “awareness.” Not because it is overused, but because it distracts from what marketing actually exists to do. Awareness should never be the focus, at any stage.
Once you stop funding awareness, you start funding results.
Table of Contents
- FAQ: The Cost of Awareness and the Rise of Activation
- Awareness as Operational Liability
- Awareness vs. Acquisition: What Really Drives Growth
- The Byproduct Principle
- AIDA’s Collapse: The Evidence for Abandonment
- Waste and Opportunity Cost: The Financial Data
- The ROI Mirage
- The Activation Funnel: A Measurable Alternative
- Toward Execution Clarity
- The Takeaway: A Costly Marketing Delusion
FAQ: The Cost of Awareness and the Rise of Activation
This FAQ distills the core lessons at play here, addressing why awareness fails as a marketing goal, how activation redefines measurable success, and what steps CMOs can take to rebuild marketing around evidence, not exposure.
Awareness as Operational Liability
Awareness was born in an era of mass exposure, when success was inferred from visibility rather than verified through data. Today, those same practices persist even as digital ecosystems provide real-time data proving that recognition does not equal readiness. A big reason for this is that the same people responsible for legacy media helped to build analytics strategies in the online world.
Awareness metrics were built on guesswork and have barely evolved. Long before digital attribution, marketers relied on surveys asking questions like, “Have you heard of this brand?” or “Do you remember seeing this ad?” Those studies became the foundation for awareness reporting, and they still shape it today. The problem is that self-reported recall measures memory, not behavior. Even when awareness scores rise, there is no evidence that the audience acted, cared or converted. Recognition does not equal readiness, yet most awareness programs still treat them as the same.
The Cost of Counting What Doesn’t Count
Programmatic advertising deepens the gap. Less than half of digital ad impressions reach human audiences. The remainder vanishes to inefficiency, fraud or off-target delivery. Small and mid-market companies waste up to 60% of marketing budgets on poorly measured campaigns, with awareness programs generating zero measurable output due to lack of conversion tracking, unclear objectives and inability to tie spend to business results.
The discipline crisis extends inside the enterprise. Budgets tied to unmeasurable goals encourage political insulation rather than accountability. Teams rewarded for “share of voice” instead of share of revenue learn to optimize for noise. Executives defending awareness budgets point to downstream performance improvements while ignoring the lag variables (pricing, seasonality or operational changes) that actually explain them.
The outcome is predictable: resource misallocation on a global scale. The illusion of reach conceals a deficit of impact, and the cost compounds annually as marketers pour more into the same black hole to sustain visibility that no longer converts.
Related Article: Marketing Leaders Take Note: The Dangerous Blur Between Strategy and Execution
Awareness vs. Acquisition: What Really Drives Growth
At first glance, awareness and acquisition seem connected. Someone has to see your brand before they can act, right? That logic feels safe, but it is also the reason marketing budgets keep bleeding.
Awareness, as a first step, is pure cost. Even with advanced targeting, awareness campaigns pay for exposure, not action. Platforms like Google and Facebook let you narrow your audience by demographics, interests or behavior, but the objective still stops at visibility. You can control who sees the ad; you just cannot control whether that visibility produces value.
Acquisition changes that. It starts with intent and works backward. Instead of paying to reach everyone who might care someday, you focus on the people who are ready to act now. The difference is not about reach; it is about purpose. Awareness chases recognition. Acquisition drives behavior.
Related Article: Customer Acquisition Makes You Famous. Customer Retention Makes You Money
Awareness vs. Activation Efficiency
Comparing how traditional awareness campaigns and activation-focused strategies impact ROI, accountability and long-term customer growth.
| Approach | Primary Objective | Measurement | ROI Impact | Long-Term Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness Campaigns | Visibility and reach | Impressions, recall, sentiment | Low — rarely tied to conversion | Depreciates quickly after spend |
| Acquisition Strategies | Drive measurable customer actions | Clicks, sign-ups, purchases | Moderate — direct and traceable | Improves short-term growth metrics |
| Activation Framework | Convert intent into engagement and retention | Activation rate, time-to-value, retention | High — directly linked to recurring revenue | Compounds value through retention and referrals |
When Purpose Replaces Presence
When acquisition comes first, awareness follows automatically, but efficiently. Fewer people see the message, but the right people engage. Every impression is earned through relevance, not bought through repetition. You create proof instead of probability.
Webinar
Nov
13
Know Your Caller Reputation: How to Protect Your Brand and Get More Calls Answered
80% of unidentified calls go unanswered. See why your calls aren’t getting through.
Register
Webinar
Nov
20
How to Build a Solid Knowledge Foundation for AI Success
See how leading brands keep their AI honest, compliant and actually helpful.
Register
Webinar
Dec
2
From Manual to Magical: How AI Transforms CX Teams
Learn how to replace manual support processes with automation that actually delivers.
Register
Webinar
Dec
9
Rebrand. Migrate. Optimize. How to Do It All (Without Slowing Down)
Cresta leveled up site speed, design flexibility and marketer sanity (in record time). Find out how.
Register
Webinar
Dec
10
Beyond Composability: How Modern Marketers Build Connected Experiences
Ready to launch campaigns faster, personalize smarter and prove your marketing ROI? Discover the power of a modern DXP.
Register
Webinar
On demand
Fix the Content Bottleneck: Build a Better WebOps Strategy
Content stalled? Dev overloaded? You’re not the only one. Learn how streamlined WebOps bridges the publishing gap.
Watch Now
This shift redefines marketing efficiency. Awareness campaigns spend to be seen; acquisition strategies invest to create movement. One produces metrics about reach, the other delivers outcomes that can be measured, optimized and scaled.
The truth is simple: awareness is what you buy when you need to look active. Acquisition is what you build when you need to drive results. Awareness spends create impressions. Acquisition converts them into evidence. And when acquisition is done well, awareness becomes the natural byproduct of your efforts, not the focus.
The Byproduct Principle
Awareness is not the cause of engagement; it is the result of effective acquisition. Strong targeting and smart messaging make the right people aware, but that awareness carries no financial value until they act. This is where most marketing breaks down. Teams celebrate exposure and lead volume as progress, yet neither measures what matters. Awareness campaigns can generate acquisition, but at a cost few organizations ever quantify. Impressions are treated as success on their own. A visible metric that feels measurable but proves nothing. True opportunity begins at activation. The moment when a potential customer becomes an active one, the measurable behavior that proves marketing worked.
From Exposure to Evidence
Performance data across industries supports this. A 25% increase in activation yields a 34% increase in recurring revenue. The same 25% gain in acquisition delivers only 25 percent growth. Activation compounds value because it transforms interest into engagement (the click, the registration, the purchase) that drives every metric that follows.
Time-to-value (TTV) is the leading indicator of retention. When users experience value quickly, within the first 36 hours of onboarding, retention rises and churn declines. Awareness plays no role in that sequence. The brand becomes known precisely because it delivered value when it mattered most.
This is the inversion of the traditional funnel. Awareness follows activation, not the reverse. Every meaningful metric (conversion rate, net revenue retention, referral volume) anchors in behavior, not exposure. When marketing starts with measurable action, awareness appears as an earned outcome, not a paid illusion.
High-performing organizations operate this way by design. They track activation as the core business health metric, optimize friction points, and build campaigns that prove impact through measurable outcomes.
AIDA’s Collapse: The Evidence for Abandonment
The AIDA model (Awareness, Interest, Desire, Action) has framed marketing thought since 1898. It is still taught in universities, echoed in boardrooms and embedded in countless planning templates. Yet not a single empirical study confirms its predictive power in modern commerce.
Why the Funnel Fell Apart
The model assumes (which is part of its problem) linear progression: a prospect sees a message, becomes interested, desires the product, and acts. In reality, digital behavior is chaotic, recursive and context-driven.
Google’s “Messy Middle” research analyzed over 300,000 customer journeys and found none that resembled a clean linear path. Consumers oscillate between exploration (expansive learning) and evaluation (reductive narrowing), often making decisions in seconds for impulse purchases or after hundreds of micro-interactions in complex categories. Google's research found that shoppers seamlessly switch between these modes sequentially or simultaneously, with some purchases bypassing the loop entirely while others require lengthy deliberation.
AIDA’s structure also ends at purchase, ignoring the compounding economics of retention, expansion and referral. In subscription and product-led growth environments, the first transaction is the beginning of the relationship, not its conclusion. Frameworks that stop at action fail to capture the 40% of revenue now generated through existing customers…a figure that rises to over 50% for companies exceeding $50M in ARR and approaches 67% for companies above $100M.
Hierarchical funnels further distort resource allocation. When organizations spend disproportionately at the top, they fund recognition that cannot be verified while starving the mechanisms that create lifetime value. The obsession with reach stems not from data but from tradition. Awareness feels foundational because it came first chronologically, not because it works.
Modern readiness models reject the linear premise entirely. They measure momentum within systems of ongoing engagement (activation velocity, retention rate, expansion revenue, and referral efficiency). Each stage is observable, time-bound, and directly linked to financial outcomes. In that structure, awareness has no independent utility. It is a relic of mass media, misplaced in a performance economy.
AIDA Model vs. Activation Funnel
How legacy awareness frameworks compare to modern performance-based systems that emphasize measurable behavior over visibility.
| Framework | Stages | Focus | Measurement Type | Modern Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIDA Model | Awareness → Interest → Desire → Action | Exposure and attention | Qualitative (recall, sentiment) | Low — lacks link to retention or revenue |
| Activation Funnel | Acquisition → Activation → Retention → Revenue → Referral | Behavior and engagement | Quantitative (conversion, time-to-value, NRR) | High — directly tied to growth and lifetime value |
Waste and Opportunity Cost: The Financial Data
The economics of awareness are indefensible once quantified. Across industries, approximately 40% of marketing budgets produce no attributable return. Programmatic audits show that only 44% of digital ad spend reaches real users; the rest disappears into technical inefficiency and inventory fraud.
Counting the Compounding Loss
Opportunity cost magnifies the damage. Performance channels consistently outperform awareness initiatives by orders of magnitude:
- Email marketing returns $42 for every $1 spent.
- SEO averages $22 per $1.
- Paid search delivers roughly $2 per $1.
- Direct mail yields an average ROI above 160% when integrated with CRM data.
By contrast, awareness programs lack any comparable return metric. Their success depends on self-referential proxies (recall surveys or social reach) whose financial correlation is statistically negligible.
This inefficiency becomes existential in markets facing budget compression. When C-suites demand proof of impact, marketing leaders relying on awareness metrics cannot provide it. The absence of measurement is not neutrality; it is negative ROI disguised as branding.
Reallocation experiments prove the point. When companies reallocate awareness budgets into activation and retention programs, revenue impact follows. BCG documented one company generating $70 million in bottom-line impact by redirecting spend from low-performing awareness campaigns to measurable performance channels. Awareness does not accumulate like capital; it depreciates immediately. Measurable engagement, by contrast, compounds over time through retention and referral.
The ROI Mirage
Awareness resists financial scrutiny because its outputs- recall, reach, and sentiment, cannot be tied to revenue with any reliability. The data confirms what most marketers already suspect but rarely say aloud: awareness is designed to appear valuable, not to prove value.
Attribution research shows that after 90 to 120 days, it becomes nearly impossible to connect awareness spending to sales performance. Even advanced media-mix models admit failure when trying to isolate awareness impact, since the metrics they rely on (survey recall or brand lift) contain heavy noise and bias.
Designed to Look Valuable, Not Be Valuable
This lack of clarity hides a deeper problem: return on investment is not just hard to measure in awareness; it is almost never positive. Programmatic inefficiencies consume more than half of awareness budgets before the ad even reaches a consumer. Smaller and mid-market companies waste up to sixty percent of spend on campaigns that are poorly tracked and unoptimized. Analysts point to the $1.85 required to recover each $1.00 cut from brand spending as evidence of sunk cost behavior, not return. These are not signs of a resilient investment; they are proof of one that cannot be defended.
Even when awareness ROI is tested, the results rarely hold up. Control groups, brand lift studies, and incrementality tests can measure exposure, but not cause. They show correlation, not contribution. A sales increase during an awareness campaign may look promising, but timing does not equal proof. The challenge is structural: awareness lacks a direct, measurable pathway to revenue. No experiment can confirm that someone bought because they first became “aware.” The link is inferential, not empirical, and that is why awareness ROI remains unproven no matter how sophisticated the testing.
The result is predictable: awareness survives not because it works, but because it avoids being measured the same way everything else is. It thrives on ambiguity. And in a field built on accountability, that should be disqualifying.
The Activation Funnel: A Measurable Alternative
A replacement for AIDA already exists: The Activation Funnel. Developed by Dave McClure, entrepreneur, angel investor, and founder of 500 Startups, it was built on operational readiness rather than recognition. It comprises five measurable stages: Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Revenue, and Referral. Each represents a behavioral milestone that can be tracked, optimized, and tied to financial outcomes.
- Acquisition identifies and attracts the highest-fit prospects through data segmentation and channel efficiency. Quality replaces quantity; conversion replaces exposure.
- Activation measures the first meaningful action (a click, registration, trial, or purchase) and seeks to minimize friction. Time-to-value is the governing metric. Organizations reducing TTV from days to hours experience double-digit gains in retention and expansion.
- Retention sustains engagement through ongoing value delivery. In subscription businesses, raising Net Revenue Retention from 90% to 110% adds 10 points of growth without new acquisition spend.
- Revenue tracks recurring and expansion value derived from activated users. Every dollar is observable, every campaign directly attributable.
- Referral converts satisfied customers into advocates. Referral conversion rates between 10% and 30% outperform all prospecting channels, and a viral coefficient above 1 signals self-reinforcing growth.
The activation model eliminates abstraction. It replaces sentiment with systems. When marketing teams instrument each stage with clear metrics, budget debates disappear. Every decision aligns to observable cause and effect. The organization evolves from storytelling to performance architecture.
This transformation also changes culture. Creative teams design for clarity of action; analysts define success in behavioral terms; leadership tracks financial velocity instead of visibility volume. Activation becomes not a tactic but a governing principle of modern marketing operations.
Toward Execution Clarity
The shift from awareness to activation is more than a framework revision; it is an organizational maturity test. Execution clarity requires that every marketing dollar, asset, and activity connect to a measurable business outcome.
In practice, this means re-engineering planning systems around activation metrics. Budgets start at the point of behavior (registration, trial, or purchase) and work backward to acquisition. Campaigns are briefed with explicit conversion goals rather than exposure targets. Reporting dashboards prioritize engagement depth, retention trend, and expansion revenue instead of impressions.
Where Clarity Becomes Culture
Zero-based budgeting enforces accountability. Teams must justify every initiative by its projected behavioral outcome. Projects built solely on awareness claims do not survive that scrutiny, because they cannot pass the test of evidence.
Culturally, execution clarity demands cross-functional literacy. Data, product, and marketing must operate as one system. The handoff between acquisition and activation becomes seamless; insights from retention feed back into acquisition strategy. The organization becomes a continuous loop of learning, not a linear push of content into the market.
Most importantly, clarity replaces conjecture. When awareness is removed, teams stop debating belief and start measuring performance. The reward is confidence; knowing that strategy aligns with data, spend aligns with impact, and every line item can be defended with evidence.
The Takeaway: A Costly Marketing Delusion
Awareness is marketing’s costliest delusion. It promises reach but delivers opacity. It consumes resources, defers accountability, and disguises failure as familiarity.
Modern marketing no longer needs faith in exposure; it needs proof of engagement. The organizations that thrive are those that define progress by action, not attention. They activate customers quickly, retain them through value, and measure success in revenue, not recall.
Eliminate awareness from your frameworks. Begin every plan with activation. Fund readiness, not recognition. Build systems where every dollar moves a metric that matters. In doing so, you will not only recover wasted budget but also rebuild marketing as a discipline grounded in evidence and performance.
Learn how you can join our contributor community.
